Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractHost plants alter their volatiles to help a solitary egg parasitoid distinguish habitats with parasitized hosts from those without    Next AbstractA new route for degradation of volatile organic compounds under visible light: using the bifunctional photocatalyst Pt/TiO2-xNx in H2-O2 atmosphere »

Proc Biol Sci


Title:Hatching responses of subsocial spitting spiders to predation risk
Author(s):Li D;
Address:"Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260. dbslidq@nus.edu.sg"
Journal Title:Proc Biol Sci
Year:2002
Volume:269
Issue:1505
Page Number:2155 - 2161
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2140
ISSN/ISBN:0962-8452 (Print) 1471-2954 (Electronic) 0962-8452 (Linking)
Abstract:"The carrying of eggs often renders parents vulnerable to predators due to increased conspicuousness or decreased mobility. Nonetheless, egg-carrying parents can escape from the predators to which they are vulnerable. Previous studies have demonstrated heavy predation by spider-eating jumping spiders (Portia labiata) on egg-carrying spitting spider (Scytodes pallida) females, but little predation on eggless females. If the timing of hatching is phenotypically plastic, then both S. pallida females and their eggs could reduce the risk of predation by hatching early. Hence, this study examines the hatching responses of S. pallida to chemical cues from P. labiata, both in the laboratory and in the field, and addresses the following questions. (i) Do cues from predatory P. labiata influence the hatching traits of S. pallida? (ii) Are the olfactory cues from predators sufficient for predator detection by S. pallida ? (iii) Are hatching responses to predatory P. labiata controlled by egg-carrying S. pallida females, or directly by their embryos? The study provides evidence of hatching as a life-history switch point, which shows an adaptive plasticity in response to predation risk in egg-carrying S. pallida. Egg-carrying S. pallida females, but not unattended eggs, adjust egg-hatching time (the interval between oviposition and hatching) in response to the threat of predation on both the female and her eggs by P. labiata. In the presence of P. labiata, eggs that are carried by females hatch sooner; the hatchlings of these eggs are therefore smaller than hatchlings born in the absence of P. labiata. Chemical cues that are released from the draglines of P. labiata are sufficient to elicit changes in the egg-hatching traits of S. pallida. Hatching early in response to this predator may benefit both females and their offspring. To my knowledge, this is the first direct experimental study to demonstrate predator-induced hatching plasticity in spiders and, in particular, in animals with parental care"
Keywords:"Adaptation, Physiological Analysis of Variance Animals *Embryonic Development Female Oviposition/*physiology Pheromones/*physiology *Predatory Behavior Risk Factors Spiders/embryology/*physiology Time Factors;"
Notes:"MedlineLi, Daiqin eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2002/10/25 Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Oct 22; 269(1505):2155-61. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2140"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 03-07-2024