Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractCascading effects of long-term land-use changes on plant traits and ecosystem functioning    Next AbstractInvolvement of SRE element of Ty1 transposon in TEC1-dependent transcriptional activation »

Oecologia


Title:Host selection behavior of a thistle-feeding fly: choices and consequences
Author(s):Lalonde RG; Roitberg BD;
Address:"Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, V5A 1S6, Burnaby, B.C., Canada"
Journal Title:Oecologia
Year:1992
Volume:90
Issue:4
Page Number:534 - 539
DOI: 10.1007/BF01875447
ISSN/ISBN:1432-1939 (Electronic) 0029-8549 (Linking)
Abstract:"Female Canada thistle seed flies (Orellia ruficauda) preferentially oviposit into seed heads which are a single day from opening. When flies are forced to oviposit into flower heads at other stages of development, offspring typically do slightly poorer: they attain a mature mass of about 15% less than do larvae derived from preferred hosts. Larval mass correlates strongly with reproductive success: heavy larvae develop into adults that produce eggs at a faster rate than do those developing from small larvae. After laying a clutch of eggs, flies circumscribe the rim of the flowerhead with their extended ovipositor and deposit a clear fluid. Flies reject previously-attacked hosts, bearing this apparent marking pheromone, significantly more often than they reject unattacked hosts. Costs of superparasitism in this system are relatively small, inasmuch as there is only a weak relationship between clutch size and larval success at the densities measured in this study. We speculate that flies are highly selective, when the apparent costs of making a mistake are rather low, because the information provided by phenological cues and by the putative marking pheromone is highly reliable, and low fecundity and time costs allow sufficient time to express a high level of discrimination"
Keywords:Fecundity Host selection Marking Superparasitism;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINELalonde, R G Roitberg, B D eng Germany 1992/07/01 Oecologia. 1992 Jul; 90(4):534-539. doi: 10.1007/BF01875447"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-12-2024