Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractA mass balance study of the phytoremediation of perchloroethylene-contaminated groundwater    Next AbstractFlight-mediated attraction ofBiprorulus bibax breddin (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) to natural and synthetic aggregation pheromone »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Attraction ofCarpophilus spp. (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) to synthetic aggregation pheromones and host-related coattractants in Australian stone fruit orchards: Beetle phenology and pheromone dose studies
Author(s):James DG; Bartelt RJ; Faulder RJ;
Address:"NSW Agriculture, Yanco Agricultural Institute, 2703, PMB Yanco, New South Wales, Australia"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:1994
Volume:20
Issue:11
Page Number:2805 - 2819
DOI: 10.1007/BF02098390
ISSN/ISBN:0098-0331 (Print) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"Synthetic aggregation pheromones ofCarpophilus hemipterus (L.) andCarpophilus mutilatus Erichson were field tested during a 10-month period in southern New South Wales stone fruit orchards to determineCarpophilus spp. phenology and the effect of two pheromone doses on attraction. Aggregation pheromones synergize the attraction of host volatiles toCarpophilus spp. Four major species,C. hemipterus, C. mutilatus, C. davidsoni Dobson andC. (Urophorus) humeralis (F.), were trapped, with greater numbers of each species inC. hemipterus pheromone/fermenting whole-wheat breaddough-baited traps, than in dough-only-traps. InC. mutilatus pheromone/ fermenting-dough-baited traps, onlyC. mutilatus andC. davidsoni responded in greater numbers than to dough-only traps. Beetles first appeared in traps in late September (early spring) when daily maximum temperatures averaged 17.5double daggerC. Trappings reached a peak during October and declined to very low levels in November-December (late spring-early summer). Numbers trapped of all species increased during February-March (late summer-early autumn), presumably due to the presence of abundant host resources (ripening and fallen fruit), and continued at high levels until May (late autumn). An 18-week study demonstrated significantly greater responses byCarpophilus spp. to 5000-Mug than to 500-Mug doses of C.hemipterus andC. mutilatus pheromones. Greatest responses to 5000Mug were recorded forC. hemipterus andC. mutilatus responding to their own pheromones (increased attraction over dough alone of 259x and 21.2x respectively). Implications of the study and the potential for using synthetic aggregation pheromones for managingCarpophilus spp. populations in Australian stone fruit are discussed"
Keywords:
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEJames, D G Bartelt, R J Faulder, R J eng 1994/11/01 J Chem Ecol. 1994 Nov; 20(11):2805-19. doi: 10.1007/BF02098390"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024