Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEmission fluxes of styrene monomers and other chemicals for products containing expanded polystyrene beads    Next AbstractModification of Streptococcus faecalis sex pheromones after acquisition of plasmid DNA »

Clin Exp Dent Res


Title:Effects of interferential current electrical stimulation (IFCS) on mastication and swallowing function in healthy young adults: A preliminary study
Author(s):Iizumi Y; Ihara Y; Koike J; Takahashi K;
Address:"Department of Special Needs Dentistry, Division of Oral Functional Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan"
Journal Title:Clin Exp Dent Res
Year:2023
Volume:20230509
Issue:3
Page Number:491 - 499
DOI: 10.1002/cre2.748
ISSN/ISBN:2057-4347 (Electronic) 2057-4347 (Linking)
Abstract:"OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the effects of interferential current electrical stimulation (IFCS) on masticatory and swallowing function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy young adults were enrolled. The measurement items were spontaneous swallowing frequency (SSF), voluntary swallowing frequency (VSF), saliva secretion volume (SSV), glucose elution volume (GEV), and velocity of chew (VOC). All participants underwent both IFCS and sham stimulation (without stimulation, sham). Two sets of independent IFCS electrodes were placed on the bilateral neck. The precise location of the upper electrodes was just below the angle of the mandible, while the lower electrodes were placed at the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The intensity of IFCS was determined to be one level below the perceptual threshold that all participants felt discomfort. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: For IFCS, the results of each measurement before and during stimulation were SSF: 1.16 and 1.46, VSF: 8.05 and 8.45, SSV: 5.33 and 5.56 g, GEV: 171.75 and 208.60 mg/dL, and VOC: 87.20 and 95.20, respectively. SSF, GEV, and VOC during stimulation were significantly increased by IFCS (SSF, p = .009; GEV, p = .048; and VOC, p = .007). Following sham stimulation, the results were SSF: 1.24 and 1.34, VSF: 7.75 and 7.90, SSV: 5.65 and 6.04 g, GEV: 176.45 and 187.35 mg/dL, and VOC: 91.35 and 88.25, respectively. CONCLUSION: While no significant differences were observed in the sham group, our findings suggest that IFCS of the superior laryngeal nerve may impact not only the swallowing function but also the masticatory function"
Keywords:Humans Young Adult *Deglutition/physiology Mastication/physiology *Volatile Organic Compounds Electric Stimulation Salivation deglutition electrical stimulation therapy mastication;
Notes:"MedlineIizumi, Yoshiki Ihara, Yoshiaki Koike, Joji Takahashi, Koji eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2023/05/09 Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Jun; 9(3):491-499. doi: 10.1002/cre2.748. Epub 2023 May 9"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 16-11-2024