Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEvaluation of Food-Based Attractants for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae)    Next Abstract"Characterization of the Potent Odorants Contributing to the Characteristic Aroma of Beijing Douzhi by Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry, Quantitative Analysis, and Odor Activity Value" »

J Med Entomol


Title:Cannibalism of Egg and Neonate Larvae by Late Stage Conspecifics of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae): Implications for Ovipositional Studies
Author(s):Huang J; Miller JR; Walker ED;
Address:"Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI"
Journal Title:J Med Entomol
Year:2018
Volume:55
Issue:4
Page Number:801 - 807
DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjy059
ISSN/ISBN:1938-2928 (Electronic) 0022-2585 (Linking)
Abstract:"Laboratory experiments intended to test the effects of a purported ovipositional deterrent pheromone of Anopheles gambiae Giles sensu stricto (Diptera: Culicidae) led instead to the finding that egg cannibalism by fourth-instar larvae explained the 'deterrent effect' rather than chemical signals from larvae. Virtually no eggs were counted from cups containing fourth-instar larvae, after oviposition. Numbers of eggs from cups containing younger, conspecific larvae, or pupae did not differ significantly from water only control. Video recording of larval behavior revealed that fourth-instar larvae consumed entire eggs in one continuous ingestive bout. Egg output in the presence of fourth-instar larvae with their mouthparts sealed was similar to the larvae-absent treatment, but nearly 100-fold greater than that counted in the presence of fourth-instar larvae that could eat freely. Thus, the huge egg reduction in eggs counted in the presence of fourth-instar larvae was due to egg cannibalism, not because presence of these larvae deterred oviposition as has been reported in previous studies. Third and especially fourth-instar larvae also cannibalized newly hatched first-instar larvae. Artificial food availability did not eliminate but did reduce cannibalism during first several hours of exposure. The rate at which fourth-instar larvae consumed conspecifics rose significantly and linearly with prey density, generating a non-plateauing, type I functional response curve. These results clearly show that care must be taken such that mosquito ovipositional experiments are not confounded by presence of cannibalizing larvae"
Keywords:Animals Anopheles/*physiology Cannibalism Female Larva/physiology *Oviposition Ovum/physiology;
Notes:"MedlineHuang, Juan Miller, James R Walker, Edward D eng England 2018/04/27 J Med Entomol. 2018 Jun 28; 55(4):801-807. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjy059"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024