| Title: | Effects of solvent-based adhesive removal on the subsequent dual analysis of fingerprint and DNA |
| Author(s): | Gausterer C; Birnbaumer G; Ondrovics W; Stein C; |
| Address: | "FDZ-Forensisches DNA Zentrallabor GmbH, Medical University of Vienna, Sensengasse 2, 1090, Vienna, Austria. christian.gausterer@meduniwien.ac.at. Criminal Intelligence Service Austria, Department II/BK/6 Forensics, Unit II/BK/6.3.1 - Dactyloscopic Reference Laboratory, Josef-Holaubek-Platz 1, 1090, Vienna, Austria. Criminal Intelligence Service Austria, Department II/BK/6 Forensics, Sub Department II/BK/6.3 - Crime Scene, Rossauer Lande 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria. FDZ-Forensisches DNA Zentrallabor GmbH, Medical University of Vienna, Sensengasse 2, 1090, Vienna, Austria" |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00414-023-03042-w |
| ISSN/ISBN: | 1437-1596 (Electronic) 0937-9827 (Print) 0937-9827 (Linking) |
| Abstract: | "The combined approach of classical fingerprinting and DNA profiling is a powerful tool in forensic investigations of latent 'touch' traces. However, little attention has been paid to the organic solvents frequently used in dactyloscopic laboratories to facilitate the separation of adhesive evidence prior to fingerprint development and downstream effects on subsequent DNA profiling. In the present study, we tested a selection of adhesive removers (n = 9) and assessed their potential impact on DNA recovery and amplification by PCR. Thereby, we identified and characterized novel PCR inhibitors. All investigated chemicals contain volatile organic compounds that evaporate under normal indoor atmospheric conditions. Exposure to certain solvents resulted in increased DNA degradation, but only if evaporation was prevented. A series of adhesive-removal experiments were conducted with prepared mock evidence (self-adhesive postage stamps affixed to paper envelope) to investigate the impact of treatment time and the location of applied traces on DNA recovery and dactyloscopy, respectively. Due to the early onset of print decomposition, we found that only a short treatment time was compatible with the development of fingerprints on the adhesive side of a stamp. Solvents also removed DNA from the adhesive surface, thus resulting in a marked shift in the substrate distribution of recovered DNA from the stamp to the envelope, but not in the reverse direction. Furthermore, we observed that treatment with conventional fingerprint reagents lead to a significant reduction in the amounts of DNA recovered from stamps, while the additional use of adhesive removers did not significantly enhance this effect" |
| Keywords: | Humans *Dermatoglyphics *Adhesives DNA Fingerprinting/methods Solvents DNA/analysis Adhesive surface DNA recovery DNA transfer Latent fingerprint development PCR inhibition Solvent-based adhesive removal; |
| Notes: | "MedlineGausterer, Christian Birnbaumer, Gerald Ondrovics, Wolfgang Stein, Christina eng Germany 2023/07/04 Int J Legal Med. 2023 Sep; 137(5):1373-1394. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-03042-w. Epub 2023 Jul 4" |
