Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractTrpc2    Next AbstractA Review of Volatile Organic Compound Contamination in Post-Industrial Urban Centers: Reproductive Health Implications Using a Detroit Lens »

Proc Biol Sci


Title:Scent mark signal investment predicts fight dynamics in house mice
Author(s):Miller CH; Haxhillari K; Hillock MF; Reichard TM; Sheehan MJ;
Address:"Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA"
Journal Title:Proc Biol Sci
Year:2023
Volume:20230215
Issue:1993
Page Number:20222489 -
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2489
ISSN/ISBN:1471-2954 (Electronic) 0962-8452 (Print) 0962-8452 (Linking)
Abstract:"Signals mediate competitive interactions by allowing rival assessment, yet are often energetically expensive to produce. One of the key mechanisms maintaining signal reliability is social costs. While the social costs of over-signalling are well known, the social costs of under-signalling are underexplored, particularly for dynamic signals. In this study, we investigate a dynamic and olfactory-mediated signalling system that is ubiquitous among mammals: scent marking. Male house mice territorially scent mark their environment with metabolically costly urine marks. Competitive male mice are thought to deposit abundant scent marks in the environment. However, we recently identified a cohort of low-marking males that win fights. We hypothesized that there may be social costs imposed on individuals who under-invest in signalling. Here we find that scent mark investment predicts fight dynamics. Winning males that produce fewer scent marks prior to a fight engage in more intense fights that take longer to resolve. This effect appears to be driven by an unwillingness among losers to acquiesce to weakly signalling winners. We, therefore, find evidence for rival assessment of scent marks as well as social costs to under-signalling. This supports existing hypotheses for the importance of social punishment in maintaining optimal signalling equilibria. Our results further highlight the possibility of diverse signalling strategies in house mice"
Keywords:Male Animals Mice *Odorants *Animal Communication Reproducibility of Results Pheromones Mammals house mice scent marking signal investment social costs strategy;
Notes:"MedlineMiller, Caitlin H Haxhillari, Klaudio Hillock, Matthew F Reichard, Tess M Sheehan, Michael J eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. England 2023/02/15 Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 22; 290(1993):20222489. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2489. Epub 2023 Feb 15"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-12-2024