Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractThe joy of sex pheromones    Next AbstractA CD36 ectodomain mediates insect pheromone detection via a putative tunnelling mechanism »

PLoS Biol


Title:Ligands for pheromone-sensing neurons are not conformationally activated odorant binding proteins
Author(s):Gomez-Diaz C; Reina JH; Cambillau C; Benton R;
Address:"Center for Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland"
Journal Title:PLoS Biol
Year:2013
Volume:20130430
Issue:4
Page Number:e1001546 -
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001546
ISSN/ISBN:1545-7885 (Electronic) 1544-9173 (Print) 1544-9173 (Linking)
Abstract:"Pheromones form an essential chemical language of intraspecific communication in many animals. How olfactory systems recognize pheromonal signals with both sensitivity and specificity is not well understood. An important in vivo paradigm for this process is the detection mechanism of the sex pheromone (Z)-11-octadecenyl acetate (cis-vaccenyl acetate [cVA]) in Drosophila melanogaster. cVA-evoked neuronal activation requires a secreted odorant binding protein, LUSH, the CD36-related transmembrane protein SNMP, and the odorant receptor OR67d. Crystallographic analysis has revealed that cVA-bound LUSH is conformationally distinct from apo (unliganded) LUSH. Recombinantly expressed mutant versions of LUSH predicted to enhance or diminish these structural changes produce corresponding alterations in spontaneous and/or cVA-evoked activity when infused into olfactory sensilla, leading to a model in which the ligand for pheromone receptors is not free cVA, but LUSH that is 'conformationally activated' upon cVA binding. Here we present evidence that contradicts this model. First, we demonstrate that the same LUSH mutants expressed transgenically affect neither basal nor pheromone-evoked activity. Second, we compare the structures of apo LUSH, cVA/LUSH, and complexes of LUSH with non-pheromonal ligands and find no conformational property of cVA/LUSH that can explain its proposed unique activated state. Finally, we show that high concentrations of cVA can induce neuronal activity in the absence of LUSH, but not SNMP or OR67d. Our findings are not consistent with the model that the cVA/LUSH complex acts as the pheromone ligand, and suggest that pheromone molecules alone directly activate neuronal receptors"
Keywords:"Acetates Action Potentials Amino Acid Substitution Animals Drosophila Proteins/metabolism Drosophila melanogaster/cytology/*physiology Ligands Male Mutagenesis, Site-Directed Neurons/*physiology Oleic Acids/physiology Pheromones/physiology Protein Conform;"
Notes:"MedlineGomez-Diaz, Carolina Reina, Jaime H Cambillau, Christian Benton, Richard eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2013/05/03 PLoS Biol. 2013; 11(4):e1001546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001546. Epub 2013 Apr 30"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024