Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractAdult Fannia benjamini complex (Diptera: Muscidae) activity in southern California and use of CO2 as an attractant    Next AbstractCrowd control: sex ratio affects sexually selected cuticular hydrocarbons in male Drosophila serrata »

J Econ Entomol


Title:Evaluation of surveillance methods for monitoring house fly abundance and activity on large commercial dairy operations
Author(s):Gerry AC; Higginbotham GE; Periera LN; Lam A; Shelton CR;
Address:"Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. alec.gerry@ucr.edu"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2011
Volume:104
Issue:3
Page Number:1093 - 1102
DOI: 10.1603/ec10393
ISSN/ISBN:0022-0493 (Print) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"Relative house fly, Musca domestica L., activity at three large dairies in central California was monitored during the peak fly activity period from June to August 2005 by using spot cards, fly tapes, bait traps, and Alsynite traps. Counts for all monitoring methods were significantly related at two of three dairies; with spot card counts significantly related to fly tape counts recorded the same week, and both spot card counts and fly tape counts significantly related to bait trap counts 1-2 wk later. Mean fly counts differed significantly between dairies, but a significant interaction between dairies sampled and monitoring methods used demonstrates that between-dairy comparisons are unwise. Estimate precision was determined by the coefficient of variability (CV) (or SE/mean). Using a CV = 0.15 as a desired level of estimate precision and assuming an integrate pest management (IPM) action threshold near the peak house fly activity measured by each monitoring method, house fly monitoring at a large dairy would require 12 spot cards placed in midafternoon shaded fly resting sites near cattle or seven bait traps placed in open areas near cattle. Software (FlySpotter; http://ucanr.org/ sites/FlySpotter/download/) using computer vision technology was developed to count fly spots on a scanned image of a spot card to dramatically reduce time invested in monitoring house flies. Counts provided by the FlySpotter software were highly correlated to visual counts. The use of spot cards for monitoring house flies is recommended for dairy IPM programs"
Keywords:"Animals California Dairying Female *Houseflies *Housing, Animal Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/*methods Insect Control/instrumentation/*methods Male Pheromones *Population Density Population Surveillance/*methods Sex Distribution;"
Notes:"MedlineGerry, Alec C Higginbotham, G E Periera, L N Lam, A Shelton, C R eng Evaluation Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2011/07/09 J Econ Entomol. 2011 Jun; 104(3):1093-102. doi: 10.1603/ec10393"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024