Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEngineering Platinum Catalysts via a Site-Isolation Strategy with Enhanced Chlorine Resistance for the Elimination of Multicomponent VOCs    Next AbstractField tests of surface seals and soil treatments to reduce fumigant emissions from shank injection of Telone C35 »

J Environ Qual


Title:Evaluation of fumigation and surface seal methods on fumigant emissions in an orchard replant field
Author(s):Gao S; Trout TJ; Schneider S;
Address:"Water Management Research Unit, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, USDA-ARS, Parlier, CA 93648, USA. sgao@fresno.ars.usda.gov"
Journal Title:J Environ Qual
Year:2008
Volume:20080211
Issue:2
Page Number:369 - 377
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0088
ISSN/ISBN:0047-2425 (Print) 0047-2425 (Linking)
Abstract:"Soil fumigation is an important management practice for controlling soil pests and enabling successful replanting of orchards. Reducing emissions is required to minimize the possible worker and bystander risk and the contribution of fumigants to the atmosphere as volatile organic compounds that lead to the formation of ground-level ozone. A field trial was conducted in a peach orchard replant field to investigate the effects of fumigation method (shank-injection vs. subsurface drip-application treatments) and surface treatments (water applications and plastic tarps) on emissions of 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and chloropicrin (CP) from shank-injection of Telone C-35 and drip application of InLine. Treatments included control (no water or soil surface treatment); standard high-density polyethylene (HDPE) tarp, virtually impermeable film (VIF) tarp, and pre-irrigation, all over shank injection; and HDPE tarp over and irrigation with micro-sprinklers before and after the drip application. The highest 1,3-D and CP emission losses over a 2-wk monitoring period were from the control (36% 1,3-D and 30% CP) and HDPE tarp (43% 1,3-D and 17% CP) over shank injection. The pre-irrigation 4 d before fumigation and VIF tarp over shank injection had similar total emission losses (19% 1,3-D and 8-9% CP). The HDPE tarp and irrigations over subsurface drip-application treatments resulted in similar and the lowest emission losses (12-13% 1,3-D, and 2-3% CP). Lower fumigant concentrations in the soil-gas phase were observed with drip-application than in the shank-injection treatments; however, all treatments provided 100% kill to citrus nematodes in bags buried from 30 to 90 cm depth. Pre-irrigation and drip application seem to be effective to minimize emissions of 1,3-D and CP"
Keywords:"Agriculture/methods Air Pollutants/*analysis/toxicity Allyl Compounds/*analysis/toxicity Animals Environmental Monitoring Fumigation/*methods Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated/*analysis/toxicity Insecticides/*analysis/toxicity Nematoda/drug effects Prunus Soil Po;"
Notes:"MedlineGao, Suduan Trout, Thomas J Schneider, Sally eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2008/02/13 J Environ Qual. 2008 Feb 11; 37(2):369-77. doi: 10.2134/jeq2007.0088. Print 2008 Mar-Apr"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024