Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDevelopment of a Personal Aerosol Sampler for Monitoring the Particle-Vapour Fractionation of SVOCs in Workplaces    Next AbstractAn electronic nose in the discrimination of patients with asthma and controls »

Animal


Title:Meta-analysis of 0 to 8 h post-prandial evolution of ruminal pH
Author(s):Dragomir C; Sauvant D; Peyraud JL; Giger-Reverdin S; Michalet-Doreau B;
Address:"1Unite de Recherches sur les Herbivores, INRA, 63122, St-Genes Champanelle, France"
Journal Title:Animal
Year:2008
Volume:2
Issue:10
Page Number:1437 - 1448
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731108002656
ISSN/ISBN:1751-7311 (Print) 1751-7311 (Linking)
Abstract:"The objective of this study was to identify relevant descriptors of ruminal pH post-prandial evolution that can replace the mean pH (considered unsatisfactory). These descriptors are to be used in the attempts to predict ruminal pH from dietary characteristics, in order to quantify the potential of a diet to induce subacute ruminal acidosis from its intrinsic characteristics. A total of 219 pH curves, reported as graphics in 48 published articles describing the post-prandial evolution of ruminal pH (first 8 h), were digitized by image analysis then summarized in 15 pH variables. Relationships among pH variables and the principal components (PCs) of pH variability were analyzed in order to identify possible alternatives to mean pH, as the average value of all pH data the curve is composed of. Two groups of pH variables were identified according to their relationship with the most important principal components. A first group, including mean pH, was closely related to PC1, which accounted for 78% of data variability; hence, correlations between variables of this group were generally high. Of these, threshold-related variables were distinct as their within-study correlations with mean pH were rather moderate (0.69 on average). This suggests they might carry supplementary information that could explain the variation in ruminal pH induced by within-study factors, e.g. diet characteristics. However, caution should be taken in their use because of their truncation at 0 h and their non-normal distribution. Variables from the second group were independent of the PC1, and thus of the first group of variables, whereas they were mostly related to PC2 and PC3. This implies they are complementary to mean pH. Of this second group, the rate of pH decreases or the time period when pH reaches its minimum might be useful to better describe the ruminal status, from the point of view of the risk of subacute ruminal acidosis"
Keywords:
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEDragomir, C Sauvant, D Peyraud, J-L Giger-Reverdin, S Michalet-Doreau, B eng England 2008/10/01 Animal. 2008 Oct; 2(10):1437-48. doi: 10.1017/S1751731108002656"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024