Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractExpression Profiles and Functional Characterization of Two Odorant-Binding Proteins From the Apple Buprestid Beetle Agrilus mali (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)    Next Abstract"Identification and Expression Analyses of Olfactory Gene Families in the Rice Grasshopper, Oxya chinensis, From Antennal Transcriptomes" »

J Pharm Sci


Title:Evaluation of hydrate-screening methods
Author(s):Cui Y; Yao E;
Address:"Small Molecule Pharmaceutical Development, Genentech, Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, California 94080, USA. yongcuil0@hotmail.com"
Journal Title:J Pharm Sci
Year:2008
Volume:97
Issue:7
Page Number:2730 - 2744
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21187
ISSN/ISBN:1520-6017 (Electronic) 0022-3549 (Linking)
Abstract:"The purpose of this work is to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of several common hydrate-screening techniques, and to provide guidelines for designing hydrate-screening programs for new drug candidates. Ten hydrate-forming compounds were selected as model compounds and six hydrate-screening approaches were applied to these compounds in an effort to generate their hydrate forms. The results prove that no screening approach is universally effective in finding hydrates for small organic compounds. Rather, a combination of different methods should be used to improve screening reliability. Among the approaches tested, the dynamic water vapor sorption/desorption isotherm (DVI) method and storage under high humidity (HH) yielded 60-70% success ratios, the lowest among all techniques studied. The risk of false negatives arises in particular for nonhygroscopic compounds. On the other hand, both slurry in water (Slurry) and temperature cycling of aqueous suspension (TCS) showed high success rates (90%) with some exceptions. The mixed solvent systems (MSS) procedure also achieved high success rates (90%), and was found to be more suitable for water-insoluble compounds. For water-soluble compounds, MSS may not be the best approach because recrystallization is difficult in solutions with high water activity. Finally, vapor diffusion (VD) yielded a reasonably high success ratio in finding hydrates (80%). However, this method suffers from experimental difficulty and unreliable results for either highly water-soluble or water-insoluble compounds. This study indicates that a reliable hydrate-screening strategy should take into consideration the solubility and hygroscopicity of the compounds studied. A combination of the Slurry or TCS method with the MSS procedure could provide a screening strategy with reasonable reliability"
Keywords:"Calorimetry, Differential Scanning Chemistry, Pharmaceutical/*methods Crystallization Drug Stability Drug Storage *Pharmaceutical Preparations/chemistry/standards Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared Thermodynamics Titrimetry Volatilization Water/*che;"
Notes:"MedlineCui, Yong Yao, Erica eng 2007/10/05 J Pharm Sci. 2008 Jul; 97(7):2730-44. doi: 10.1002/jps.21187"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-11-2024