Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractRespiratory and irritant health effects of ambient volatile organic compounds. The Kanawha County Health Study    Next Abstract"The role of chemosensory protein 10 in the detection of behaviorally active compounds in brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens" »

Atmos Environ (1994)


Title:"Volatile organic compound conversion by ozone, hydroxyl radicals, and nitrate radicals in residential indoor air: Magnitudes and impacts of oxidant sources"
Author(s):Waring MS; Wells JR;
Address:"Drexel University, Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, 3141 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. Exposure Assessment Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV 26505, United States"
Journal Title:Atmos Environ (1994)
Year:2015
Volume:106
Issue:
Page Number:382 - 391
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.062
ISSN/ISBN:1352-2310 (Print) 1352-2310 (Linking)
Abstract:"Indoor chemistry may be initiated by reactions of ozone (O(3)), the hydroxyl radical (OH), or the nitrate radical (NO(3)) with volatile organic compounds (VOC). The principal indoor source of O(3) is air exchange, while OH and NO(3) formation are considered as primarily from O(3) reactions with alkenes and nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)), respectively. Herein, we used time-averaged models for residences to predict O(3), OH, and NO(3) concentrations and their impacts on conversion of typical residential VOC profiles, within a Monte Carlo framework that varied inputs probabilistically. We accounted for established oxidant sources, as well as explored the importance of two newly realized indoor sources: (i) the photolysis of nitrous acid (HONO) indoors to generate OH and (ii) the reaction of stabilized Criegee intermediates (SCI) with NO(2) to generate NO(3). We found total VOC conversion to be dominated by reactions both with O(3), which almost solely reacted with d-limonene, and also with OH, which reacted with d-limonene, other terpenes, alcohols, aldehydes, and aromatics. VOC oxidation rates increased with air exchange, outdoor O(3), NO(2) and d-limonene sources, and indoor photolysis rates; and they decreased with O(3) deposition and nitric oxide (NO) sources. Photolysis was a strong OH formation mechanism for high NO, NO(2), and HONO settings, but SCI/NO(2) reactions weakly generated NO(3) except for only a few cases"
Keywords:Indoor chemistry Monte Carlo modeling Photolysis Terpenes VOC oxidation;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEWaring, Michael S Wells, J Raymond eng CC999999/Intramural CDC HHS/ England 2016/02/09 Atmos Environ (1994). 2015 Apr; 106:382-391. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.062"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024