Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractPredator-released hydrocarbons repel oviposition by a mosquito    Next AbstractTranscription and regulatory signals at the mating type locus in yeast »

PLoS One


Title:Species-specific non-physical interference competition among mosquito larvae
Author(s):Silberbush A; Tsurim I; Rosen R; Margalith Y; Ovadia O;
Address:"Center for Biological Control (CBC), Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel. Center for Biological Control (CBC), Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel ; Department of Life Sciences, Achva Academic College, Arugot, Israel. Department of Entomology, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel"
Journal Title:PLoS One
Year:2014
Volume:20140218
Issue:2
Page Number:e88650 -
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088650
ISSN/ISBN:1932-6203 (Electronic) 1932-6203 (Linking)
Abstract:"Individuals of different sex, size or developmental stage can compete differently and hence contribute distinctively to population dynamics. In species with complex life cycles such as insects, competitive ability is often positively correlated with larval developmental stage. Yet, little is known on how the development and survival of early-instars is influenced by interference from late-instar larvae, especially at low densities when exploitative competition is expected to be negligible. Furthermore, the specificity and mechanisms by which interference competition operates are largely unknown. We performed two complementary experiments aiming to quantify the competitive effects of late instar Ochlerotatus caspius on early instar larvae at low densities and under high resource supply rate. The first experiment examined the net effect of interference by 4(th) on 1(st) instar O. caspius larvae, relative to the effect of 1(st) instars on themselves. The second experiment examined the effect of species-specific, non-physical interference competition (i.e., cage larvae) by 4(th) on 1(st) instar O. caspius larvae at low or high densities. Specifically, we compared the responses of O. caspius larvae raised in the presence of caged con- or hetero-specific, Culiseta longiareolata, with that of larvae in the empty-cage control group. As expected, interference from late instar larvae had a net negative effect on the development rate of first instars. In contrast, the presence of caged con-specifics (non-physical interference) accelerated the development rate of O. caspius, however, this pattern was only evident at the low density. Notably, no such pattern was detected in the presence of caged hetero-specifics. These results strongly suggest the existence of species-specific growth regulating semiochemicals"
Keywords:Animals Larva/growth & development *Ochlerotatus/growth & development Population Dynamics Species Specificity Survival Analysis;
Notes:"MedlineSilberbush, Alon Tsurim, Ido Rosen, Ran Margalith, Yoel Ovadia, Ofer eng 2014/02/22 PLoS One. 2014 Feb 18; 9(2):e88650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088650. eCollection 2014"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024