Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractVolatile biomarkers of pulmonary tuberculosis in the breath    Next AbstractPoint-of-care breath test for biomarkers of active pulmonary tuberculosis »

J Breath Res


Title:Volatile biomarkers in the breath of women with breast cancer
Author(s):Phillips M; Cataneo RN; Saunders C; Hope P; Schmitt P; Wai J;
Address:"Menssana Research Inc, Fort Lee, NJ 07024-6510, USA. mphillips@menssanaresearch.com"
Journal Title:J Breath Res
Year:2010
Volume:20100302
Issue:2
Page Number:26003 -
DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/4/2/026003
ISSN/ISBN:1752-7163 (Electronic) 1752-7155 (Linking)
Abstract:"We sought biomarkers of breast cancer in the breath because the disease is accompanied by increased oxidative stress and induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes, both of which generate volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that are excreted in breath. We analyzed breath VOCs in 54 women with biopsy-proven breast cancer and 204 cancer-free controls, using gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy. Chromatograms were converted into a series of data points by segmenting them into 900 time slices (8 s duration, 4 s overlap) and determining their alveolar gradients (abundance in breath minus abundance in ambient room air). Monte Carlo simulations identified time slices with better than random accuracy as biomarkers of breast cancer by excluding random identifiers. Patients were randomly allocated to training sets or test sets in 2:1 data splits. In the training sets, time slices were ranked according their C-statistic values (area under curve of receiver operating characteristic), and the top ten time slices were combined in multivariate algorithms that were cross-validated in the test sets. Monte Carlo simulations identified an excess of correct over random time slices, consistent with non-random biomarkers of breast cancer in the breath. The outcomes of ten random data splits (mean (standard deviation)) in the training sets were sensitivity = 78.5% (6.14), specificity = 88.3% (5.47), C-statistic = 0.89 (0.03) and in the test sets, sensitivity = 75.3% (7.22), specificity = 84.8 (9.97), C-statistic = 0.83 (0.06). A breath test identified women with breast cancer, employing a combination of volatile biomarkers in a multivariate algorithm"
Keywords:"Adult Biomarkers, Tumor/*analysis Breast Neoplasms/*diagnosis *Breath Tests Case-Control Studies Female Humans Middle Aged Sensitivity and Specificity Volatilization;"
Notes:"MedlinePhillips, Michael Cataneo, Renee N Saunders, Christobel Hope, Peter Schmitt, Peter Wai, James eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2011/03/09 J Breath Res. 2010 Jun; 4(2):026003. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/4/2/026003. Epub 2010 Mar 2"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-11-2024