Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractTemporal coding of pheromone pulses and trains in Manduca sexta    Next AbstractResearch protocol for a diagnostic study of non-invasive exhaled breath analysis for the prediction of oesophago-gastric cancer »

Sensors (Basel)


Title:Volatile Olfactory Profiles of Umbrian Extra Virgin Olive Oils and Their Discrimination through MOX Chemical Sensors
Author(s):Mariotti R; Nunez-Carmona E; Genzardi D; Pandolfi S; Sberveglieri V; Mousavi S;
Address:"Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources, National Research Council, 06128 Perugia, Italy. Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources, National Research Council, URT-Reggio Emilia, Via J. F. Kennedy 17/I, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy"
Journal Title:Sensors (Basel)
Year:2022
Volume:20220921
Issue:19
Page Number: -
DOI: 10.3390/s22197164
ISSN/ISBN:1424-8220 (Electronic) 1424-8220 (Linking)
Abstract:"Extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) is the best vegetable oil worldwide but, at the same time, is one of the product victims of fraud in the agri-food sector, and the differences about quality within the extra-virgin olive oil category are often missed. Several scientific techniques were applied in order to guarantee the authenticity and quality of this EVOO. In the present study, the volatile compounds (VOCs) by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with solid-phase micro-extraction detection (GC-MS SPME), organoleptic analysis by the official Slow Food panel and the detection by a Small Sensor System (S3) were applied. Ten EVOOs from Umbria, a central Italian region, were selected from the 2021 Slow Food Italian extra virgin olive oil official guide, which includes hundreds of high-quality olive oils. The results demonstrated the possibility to discriminate the ten EVOOs, even if they belong to the same Italian region, by all three techniques. The result of GC-MS SPME detection was comparable at the discrimination level to the organoleptic test with few exceptions, while the S3 was able to better separate some EVOOs, which were not discriminated perfectly by the other two methods. The correlation analysis performed among and between the three methodologies allowed us to identify 388 strong associations with a p value less than 0.05. This study has highlighted how much the mix of VOCs was different even among few and localized EVOOs. The correlation with the sensor detection, which is faster and chipper compared to the other two techniques, elucidated the similarities and discrepancies between the applied methods"
Keywords:Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods Olive Oil/analysis Plant Oils Solid Phase Microextraction/methods *Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis aroma local olive cultivars sensors sensory analysis virgin olive oil volatile compounds;
Notes:"MedlineMariotti, Roberto Nunez-Carmona, Estefania Genzardi, Dario Pandolfi, Saverio Sberveglieri, Veronica Mousavi, Soraya eng Switzerland 2022/10/15 Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 21; 22(19):7164. doi: 10.3390/s22197164"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024