Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Identification of a New Blend of Host Fruit Volatiles from Red Downy Hawthorn, Crataegus mollis, Attractive to Rhagoletis pomonella Flies from the Northeastern United States"    Next AbstractBehavioral evidence for contextual olfactory-mediated avoidance of the ubiquitous phytopathogen Botrytis cinerea by Drosophila suzukii »

Environ Entomol


Title:A Multiple-Choice Bioassay Approach for Rapid Screening of Key Attractant Volatiles
Author(s):Cha DH; Loeb GM; Linn CE; Hesler SP; Landolt PJ;
Address:"US Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, USDA-ARS, Hilo, HI. Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Geneva, NY. Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Wapato, WA"
Journal Title:Environ Entomol
Year:2018
Volume:47
Issue:4
Page Number:946 - 950
DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvy054
ISSN/ISBN:1938-2936 (Electronic) 0046-225X (Linking)
Abstract:"Fermentation volatiles attract a wide variety of insects and are used for integrated pest management. However, identification of the key behavior modifying chemicals has often been challenging due to the time consuming nature of thorough behavioral tests and unexpected discrepancies between laboratory and field results. Thus we report on a multiple-choice bioassay approach that may expedite the process of identifying field-worthy attractants in the laboratory. We revisited the four-component key chemical blend (acetic acid, ethanol, acetoin, and methionol) identified from 12 antennally active wine and vinegar chemicals for Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae). The identification of this blend took 2 yr of continuous laboratory two-choice assays and then similarly designed field trials. This delay was mainly due to a discrepancy between laboratory and field results that laboratory two-choice assay failed to identify methionol as an attractant component. Using a multiple-choice approach, we compared the co-attractiveness of the 12 potential attractants to an acetic acid plus ethanol mixture, known as the basal attractant for D. suzukii, and found similar results as the previous field trials. Only two compounds, acetoin and, importantly, methionol, increased attraction to a mixture of acetic acid and ethanol, suggesting the identification of the four-component blend could have been expedited. Interestingly, the co-attractiveness of some of the 12 individual compounds, including a key attractant, methionol, appears to change when they were tested under different background odor environments, suggesting that background odor can influence detection of potential attractants. Our findings provide a potentially useful approach to efficiently identify behaviorally bioactive fermentation chemicals"
Keywords:Acetic Acid/chemistry/pharmacology Acetoin/pharmacology Animals *Chemotaxis Drosophila/*physiology Ethanol/pharmacology Female Fermentation Insect Control/*methods Male Pheromones/*pharmacology Propanols/pharmacology Random Allocation Sulfides/pharmacolog;
Notes:"MedlineCha, Dong H Loeb, Gregory M Linn, Charles E Jr Hesler, Stephen P Landolt, Peter J eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. England 2018/04/19 Environ Entomol. 2018 Aug 11; 47(4):946-950. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvy054"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-11-2024