Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractRapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae by real-time analysis of volatile metabolites    Next AbstractTiming of induced resistance in a clonal plant network »

New Phytol


Title:Systemic induced resistance: a risk-spreading strategy in clonal plant networks?
Author(s):Gomez S; Onoda Y; Ossipov V; Stuefer JF;
Address:"Experimental Plant Ecology, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands. Present address: Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA. Plant Ecology and Biodiversity, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands. Department of Chemistry. University of Turku, Turku, Finland"
Journal Title:New Phytol
Year:2008
Volume:179
Issue:4
Page Number:1142 - 1153
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02542.x
ISSN/ISBN:1469-8137 (Electronic) 0028-646X (Linking)
Abstract:"Clonal plant networks consist of interconnected individuals (ramets) of different sizes and ages. They represent heterogeneous ramet assemblages with marked differences in quality and attractiveness for herbivores. Here, feeding preferences of a generalist herbivore (Spodoptera exigua) for differently-aged ramets of Trifolium repens were studied, and changes in herbivore preference in response to systemic defense induction were investigated. Dual-choice tests were used to assess the preference of herbivores for young versus mature ramets of induced and uninduced plants, respectively. Additionally, leaf traits related to nutrition, biomechanics and chemical defense were measured to explain variation in tissue quality and herbivore preference. Young ramets were heavily damaged in control plants. After systemic defense induction, damage on young ramets was greatly reduced, while damage on mature ramets increased slightly. Defense induction increased leaf strength and thickness, decreased leaf soluble carbohydrates and substantially changed phenolic composition of undamaged ramets connected to attacked individuals. Systemic induced resistance led to a more dispersed feeding pattern among ramets of different ages. It is proposed that inducible defense acts as a risk-spreading strategy in clonal plants by equalizing herbivore preference within the clone, thereby avoiding extended selective feeding on valuable plant tissues"
Keywords:Animals Biomechanical Phenomena Carbohydrates/analysis Carbon/analysis Food Preferences Genotype Larva/physiology Nitrogen/analysis Phenols/analysis Plant Leaves/anatomy & histology/chemistry/physiology Spodoptera/growth & development/*physiology Trifoliu;
Notes:"MedlineGomez, Sara Onoda, Yusuke Ossipov, Vladimir Stuefer, Josef F eng England 2008/07/17 New Phytol. 2008; 179(4):1142-1153. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02542.x"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024