Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractPelagic diatoms communicate through synchronized beacon natural fluorescence signaling    Next AbstractSemivolatile and volatile compounds in combustion of polyethylene »

Gen Comp Endocrinol


Title:"Social behavior, chemical communication, and adult neurogenesis: studies of scent mark function in Podarcis wall lizards"
Author(s):Font E; Barbosa D; Sampedro C; Carazo P;
Address:"Ethology lab, Instituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad y Biologia Evolutiva, Universidad de Valencia, Apdo. 22085, 46071 Valencia, Spain. enrique.font@uv.es"
Journal Title:Gen Comp Endocrinol
Year:2012
Volume:20120303
Issue:1
Page Number:9 - 17
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2012.02.015
ISSN/ISBN:1095-6840 (Electronic) 0016-6480 (Linking)
Abstract:"Lacertid lizards have been hailed as a model system for the study of reptilian chemical communication. However, results obtained with the genus Podarcis, a diverse group of wall lizards with complex systematics, challenge emerging paradigms and caution against hasty generalizations. Here we review the available evidence on the role of chemical stimuli in male-female and male-male interactions in Iberian Podarcis. Males of several species can discriminate between chemicals left on substrates by females of their own or a different species, suggesting that differences in female chemical cues may underlie species recognition in this group. Females, on the other hand, do not respond differentially to conspecific and congeneric male scent marks. Males of Podarcis liolepis use scent marks to recognize rivals individually, evaluate their competitive ability (i.e., body size), and assess the threat posed by each individual rival neighbor. In contrast, females do not exhibit a preference for territories scent marked by larger (i.e., more competitive) males, which suggests a limited role for male scent marks in pre-copulatory mate choice. This behavioral sex difference is consistent with detailed neuro-ethological evidence showing that chemosensory brain areas in P. liolepis are sexually dimorphic. The accessory olfactory bulbs are larger (both in absolute and relative terms) in males than in females, probably as a result of sex-specific rates of adult neurogenesis. In both sexes, cell proliferation undergoes seasonal cycles that may have evolved to satisfy increased chemosensory demands at particular times of the year. Overall, and against recent generalizations, these results suggest that male scent marks have been shaped mainly by strong intrasexual selection"
Keywords:"Animal Communication Animals Female Lizards/*metabolism/*physiology Male Neurogenesis/physiology Pheromones/*metabolism Sexual Behavior, Animal/physiology;"
Notes:"MedlineFont, Enrique Barbosa, Diana Sampedro, Carlos Carazo, Pau eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2012/03/13 Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2012 May 15; 177(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 Mar 3"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024