Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractUse of olive leaf extract to reduce lipid oxidation of baked snacks    Next AbstractSalt intake and reproductive function in sheep »

Environ Sci Technol


Title:Uncertainties influencing health-based prioritization of ozone abatement options
Author(s):Digar A; Cohan DS; Bell ML;
Address:"Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, MS-519, Houston, Texas 77005, USA. antara@rice.edu"
Journal Title:Environ Sci Technol
Year:2011
Volume:20110825
Issue:18
Page Number:7761 - 7767
DOI: 10.1021/es200165n
ISSN/ISBN:1520-5851 (Electronic) 0013-936X (Linking)
Abstract:"The primary goal of air quality management is protection of human health. Therefore, formulation of ground-level ozone mitigation policies could be informed by considering not just attainment of regulatory standards but also how control measures benefit public health. However, evaluation of health impacts is complicated by uncertainties associated with photochemical modeling and epidemiological studies. This study demonstrates methods to characterize uncertainties influencing health-benefits estimation of ozone reduction (averted premature mortalities due to short-term exposure) in the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) region. Uncertainty in photochemical modeling and the selection of temporal metric (duration of ozone exposure) for concentration-response relationships can each affect the health-based prioritization of ozone control options. For example, deterministic results (neglecting uncertainties) based on 8-h daily maximum ozone reduction shows DFW anthropogenic NO(x) controls to yield 9.23 times as much benefit per ton as VOC controls. However, the rankings reverse under 5.7% of the cases (including 2.8% cases that exhibit incremental mortalities due to NO(X) control) when uncertainties in the photochemical model are considered. Evaluated ozone exposure on a 24-h rather than an 8-h basis also reverses the rankings"
Keywords:"Air Pollution/*prevention & control Environmental Monitoring *Health Priorities *Models, Theoretical Monte Carlo Method Nitrogen Oxides/analysis *Oxidants, Photochemical/analysis *Ozone/analysis Texas *Uncertainty Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis;"
Notes:"MedlineDigar, Antara Cohan, Daniel S Bell, Michelle L eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 2011/08/16 Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Sep 15; 45(18):7761-7. doi: 10.1021/es200165n. Epub 2011 Aug 25"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024