Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Response to the Letter to the Editor sent by Judith Anderson, industrial hygienist at the association of flight attendants"    Next AbstractSex Pheromone Dosages and Release Point Densities for Mating Disruption of Ostrinia furnacalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in NE China Corn Fields »

Environ Entomol


Title:Use of pheromone timed insecticide applications integrated with mating disruption or mass trapping against Ostrinia furnacalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in sweet corn
Author(s):Chen RZ; Klein MG; Sheng CF; Li Y; Shao DX; Li QY;
Address:"College of Agronomy, Jilin Agricultural University, 2888 Xincheng Rd., Changchun 130118, Jilin Province, China"
Journal Title:Environ Entomol
Year:2013
Volume:20131125
Issue:6
Page Number:1390 - 1399
DOI: 10.1603/EN13143
ISSN/ISBN:1938-2936 (Electronic) 0046-225X (Linking)
Abstract:"Mating disruption and mass trapping of Ostrinia furnacalis (Genuee), often called the Asian corn borer, were incorporated with insecticides to reduce pesticide use. Pesticides alone are often ineffective owing to problems in timing applications before the larvae enter the protection of corn stalks. In addition, overuse of insecticides has caused environmental contamination and concerns about consumer health. In 2010, 15 insecticides were compared with mating disruption or mass trapping at various dispenser (disp.) densities for reducing egg masses, trap captures, and ear damage. Mass trapping with 30 and 40 disp./ha, mating disruption with 300 disp./ha, or endosulfan, chlorpyrifos, and monosultap (0.55, 0.35, and 0.55 kg/ha, respectively) gave asymptotically equal to50% ear protection. In 2011, an insecticide alone, no treatments, pheromone alone, and pheromone + insecticide were examined. The same insecticides in combination with mating disruption or mass trapping at >==200 or>==20 disp./ha gave >90% ear protection even when chemical applications were reduced to 1 from 3, and the rates were reduced 50-75%. Pheromone dispensers contained >50% of their initial load 30 d after exposure"
Keywords:"Animals Insect Control/*methods *Insecticides Male *Moths Ovum *Pheromones Population Dynamics Sexual Behavior, Animal/drug effects *Zea mays;"
Notes:"MedlineChen, Ri-Zhao Klein, Michael G Sheng, Cheng-Fa Li, Yu Shao, Dong-Xiang Li, Qi-Yun eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2013/11/28 Environ Entomol. 2013 Dec; 42(6):1390-9. doi: 10.1603/EN13143. Epub 2013 Nov 25"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-11-2024