Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractIdentification and cloning of odorant binding proteins from the scarab beetle Phyllopertha diversa    Next AbstractCrystal structure of a MAT alpha 2 homeodomain-operator complex suggests a general model for homeodomain-DNA interactions »

J Occup Environ Hyg


Title:"Is 3D printing safe? Analysis of the thermal treatment of thermoplastics: ABS, PLA, PET, and nylon"
Author(s):Wojtyla S; Klama P; Baran T;
Address:"a SajTom Light Future Ltd. , Czaniec , Poland. b 3DKreator Ltd. , Cracow , Poland. c Department of Chemistry , University of Milan , Milan , Italy"
Journal Title:J Occup Environ Hyg
Year:2017
Volume:14
Issue:6
Page Number:D80 - D85
DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1285489
ISSN/ISBN:1545-9632 (Electronic) 1545-9624 (Linking)
Abstract:"The fast development of low-cost desktop three-dimensional (3D) printers has made those devices widely accessible for goods manufacturing at home. However, is it safe? Users may belittle the effects or influences of pollutants (organic compounds and ultrafine particles) generated by the devices in question. Within the scope of this study, the authors attempt to investigate thermal decomposition of the following commonly used, commercially available thermoplastic filaments: acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and nylon. Thermogravimetric analysis has shown the detailed thermal patterns of their behavior upon increasing temperature in neutral atmosphere, while GC analysis of organic vapors emitted during the process of heating thermoplastics have made it possible to obtain crucial pieces of information about the toxicity of 3D printing process. The conducted study has shown that ABS is significantly more toxic than PLA. The emission of volatile organic compounds (VOC) has been in the range of 0.50 micromol/h. Styrene has accounted for more than 30% of total VOC emitted from ABS, while for PLA, methyl methacrylate has been detected as the predominant compound (44% of total VOCs emission). Moreover, the authors have summarized available or applicable methods that can eliminate formed pollutants and protect the users of 3D printers. This article summarizes theoretical knowledge on thermal degradation of polymers used for 3D printers and shows results of authors' investigation, as well as presents forward-looking solutions that may increase the safety of utilization of 3D printers"
Keywords:"Acrylic Resins/*chemistry Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control Butadienes/*chemistry *Hot Temperature Nylons/*chemistry Plastics/chemistry Polyesters/*chemistry Polyethylene Terephthalates/*chemistry Polystyrenes/*chemistry *Printing, Three-Dimensio;"
Notes:"MedlineWojtyla, Szymon Klama, Piotr Baran, Tomasz eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2017/02/07 J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 Jun; 14(6):D80-D85. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1285489"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024