Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractMosquito bite prevention through self-assembled cellulose nanocrystals    Next Abstract[Effect of chemical attractants on synanthropic flies] »

Environ Sci Technol


Title:Electrostatic sampler for semivolatile aerosols: chemical artifacts
Author(s):Volckens J; Leith D;
Address:"Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-7431, USA. volckens@unc.edu"
Journal Title:Environ Sci Technol
Year:2002
Volume:36
Issue:21
Page Number:4608 - 4612
DOI: 10.1021/es0207100
ISSN/ISBN:0013-936X (Print) 0013-936X (Linking)
Abstract:"Electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) show promise as an alternative sampling method for semivolatile aerosols because they are less susceptible to adsorptive and evaporative artifacts than filter based methods. However, the corona discharge may after the chemical composition of a sampled aerosol. Chemical artifacts associated with electrostatic precipitation of semivolatile aerosols were investigated in the laboratory. ESPs and filters sampled both particles and vapors of alkanes, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and alkenes across varying concentrations. Gravimetric measurements between the two sampling methods were well correlated. Ozone generated by the ESP corona was the primary cause of alkene reactions in the gas phase. Particles collected within the corona region were vulnerable to irradiation by corona ions overtime. Particles collected outside the corona region did not react. Vapors passing through the corona reacted to a lesser extent. Vapors captured after passing through the ESP reacted with ozone that was not removed by the vapor trap. Chemical speciation of highly reactive compounds (i.e., alkenes or other compounds with relatively short half-lives outdoors) is not appropriate with ESPs. Electrostatic precipitation of these compounds is appropriate, however, when total organic carbon is of interest as the ESP does not alter the amount of mass measured gravimetrically. ESPs can make accurate measurements of more persistent semivolatile compounds, such as alkanes and PAHs"
Keywords:Aerosols/*analysis Artifacts Chemical Precipitation Environmental Monitoring/*methods Hydrocarbons/*analysis Particle Size Reproducibility of Results Static Electricity Volatilization;
Notes:"MedlineVolckens, John Leith, David eng T32ES07018/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/ Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. 2002/11/16 Environ Sci Technol. 2002 Nov 1; 36(21):4608-12. doi: 10.1021/es0207100"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024