Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractFungistatic Activity Mediated by Volatile Organic Compounds Is Isolate-Dependent in Trichoderma sp. 'atroviride B'    Next AbstractThe evolution of honest queen pheromones in insect societies »

PLoS One


Title:Ant queen egg-marking signals: matching deceptive laboratory simplicity with natural complexity
Author(s):van Zweden JS; Heinze J; Boomsma JJ; d'Ettorre P;
Address:"Centre for Social Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. jvzweden@bio.ku.dk"
Journal Title:PLoS One
Year:2009
Volume:20090305
Issue:3
Page Number:e4718 -
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004718
ISSN/ISBN:1932-6203 (Electronic) 1932-6203 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Experiments under controlled laboratory conditions can produce decisive evidence for testing biological hypotheses, provided they are representative of the more complex natural conditions. However, whether this requirement is fulfilled is seldom tested explicitly. Here we provide a lab/field comparison to investigate the identity of an egg-marking signal of ant queens. Our study was based on ant workers resolving conflict over male production by destroying each other's eggs, but leaving queen eggs unharmed. For this, the workers need a proximate cue to discriminate between the two egg types. Earlier correlative evidence indicated that, in the ant Pachycondyla inversa, the hydrocarbon 3,11-dimethylheptacosane (3,11-diMeC(27)) is more abundant on the surface of queen-laid eggs. METHODOLOGY: We first tested the hypothesis that 3,11-diMeC(27) functions as a queen egg-marking pheromone using laboratory-maintained colonies. We treated worker-laid eggs with synthetic 3,11-diMeC(27) and found that they were significantly more accepted than sham-treated worker-laid eggs. However, we repeated the experiment with freshly collected field colonies and observed no effect of treating worker-laid eggs with 3,11-diMeC(27), showing that this compound by itself is not the natural queen egg-marking pheromone. We subsequently investigated the overall differences of entire chemical profiles of eggs, and found that queen-laid eggs in field colonies are more distinct from worker-laid eggs than in lab colonies, have more variation in profiles, and have an excess of longer-chain hydrocarbons. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that queen egg-marking signals are significantly affected by transfer to the laboratory, and that this change is possibly connected to reduced queen fertility as predicted by honest signaling theory. This change is reflected in the worker egg policing response under field and laboratory conditions"
Keywords:"Alkanes/*analysis Animals Ants Female Laboratories Male Ovum/*chemistry Pheromones Research *Sexual Behavior, Animal;"
Notes:"Medlinevan Zweden, Jelle S Heinze, Jurgen Boomsma, Jacobus J d'Ettorre, Patrizia eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2009/03/06 PLoS One. 2009; 4(3):e4718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004718. Epub 2009 Mar 5"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024