Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractGas signatures from Escherichia coli and Escherichia coli-inoculated human whole blood    Next AbstractGeographic variation in sexual attraction of Spodoptera frugiperda corn- and rice-strain males to pheromone lures »

Am Nat


Title:The mothematics of female pheromone signaling: strategies for aging virgins
Author(s):Umbers KD; Symonds MR; Kokko H;
Address:"Centre of Excellence in Biological Interactions, Division of Ecology, Evolution, and Genetics, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra 0200, Australia"
Journal Title:Am Nat
Year:2015
Volume:20150202
Issue:3
Page Number:417 - 432
DOI: 10.1086/679614
ISSN/ISBN:1537-5323 (Electronic) 0003-0147 (Linking)
Abstract:"Although females rarely experience strong mate limitation, delays or lifelong problems of mate acquisition are detrimental to female fitness. In systems where males search for females via pheromone plumes, it is often difficult to assess whether female signaling is costly. Direct costs include the energetics of pheromone production and attention from unwanted eavesdroppers, such as parasites, parasitoids, and predators. Suboptimal outcomes are also possible from too many or too few mating events or near-simultaneous arrival of males who make unwanted mating attempts (even if successfully thwarted). We show that, in theory, even small costs can lead to a scenario where young females signal less intensely (lower pheromone concentration and/or shorter time spent signaling) and increase signaling effort only as they age and gather evidence (while still virgin) on whether sperm limitation threatens their reproductive success. Our synthesis of the empirical data available on Lepidoptera supports this prediction for one frequently reported component of signaling-time spent calling (often reported as the time of onset of calling at night)-but not for another, pheromone titer. This difference is explicable under the plausible but currently untested assumption that signaling earlier than other females each night is a more reliable way of increasing the probability of acquiring at least one mate than producing a more concentrated pheromone plume"
Keywords:"Aging Animal Communication Animals Female Male Models, Biological Moths/*physiology Pheromones/*metabolism Sexual Behavior, Animal/*physiology;"
Notes:"MedlineUmbers, Kate D L Symonds, Matthew R E Kokko, Hanna eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2015/02/13 Am Nat. 2015 Mar; 185(3):417-32. doi: 10.1086/679614. Epub 2015 Feb 2"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024