Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Effect of foliar application of seaweed (organic fertilizer) on yield, essential oil and chemical composition of coriander"    Next AbstractBiomolecular archaeology reveals ancient origins of indigenous tobacco smoking in North American Plateau »

Curr Zool


Title:Comparative analysis of experimental testing procedures for the elicitation of rescue actions in ants
Author(s):Turza F; Miler K;
Address:"Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, Krakow 30-387, Poland. Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Slawkowska 17, Krakow 31-016, Poland"
Journal Title:Curr Zool
Year:2022
Volume:20210701
Issue:2
Page Number:159 - 168
DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoab052
ISSN/ISBN:1674-5507 (Print) 2396-9814 (Electronic) 1674-5507 (Linking)
Abstract:"Rescue behavior is observed when 1 individual provides help to another individual in danger. Most reports of rescue behavior concern ants (Formicidae), in which workers rescue each other from various types of entrapment. Many of these entrapment situations can be simulated in the laboratory using an entrapment bioassay, in which ants confront a single endangered nest mate entrapped on a sandy arena by means of an artificial snare. Here, we compared numerous characteristics of rescue actions (contact between individuals, digging around the entrapped individual, pulling at its body parts, transport of the sand covering it, and biting the snare entrapping it) in Formica cinerea ants. We performed entrapment tests in the field and in the laboratory, with the latter under varying conditions in terms of the number of ants potentially engaged in rescue actions and the arena substrate (marked or unmarked by ants' pheromones). Rescue actions were more probable and pronounced in the field than in the laboratory, regardless of the type of test. Moreover, different test types in the laboratory yielded inconsistent results and showed noteworthy variability depending on the tested characteristic of rescue. Our results illustrate the specifics of ant rescue actions elicited in the natural setting, which is especially important considering the scarcity of field data. Furthermore, our results underline the challenges related to the comparison of results from different types of entrapment tests reported in the available literature. Additionally, our study shows how animal behavior differs in differing experimental setups used to answer the same questions"
Keywords:"animal behavior ants entrapment bioassay, Formica cinerea rescue behavior;"
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINETurza, Filip Miler, Krzysztof eng England 2022/04/01 Curr Zool. 2021 Jul 1; 68(2):159-168. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoab052. eCollection 2022 Apr"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024