Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEvaluation of needle trap micro-extraction and automatic alveolar sampling for point-of-care breath analysis    Next AbstractEffects of elevated oxygen levels on VOC analysis by means of PTR-ToF-MS »

J Breath Res


Title:"Effects of humidity, CO(2) and O(2) on real-time quantitation of breath biomarkers by means of PTR-ToF-MS"
Author(s):Trefz P; Schubert JK; Miekisch W;
Address:"Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Medicine Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057 Rostock, Germany"
Journal Title:J Breath Res
Year:2018
Volume:20180301
Issue:2
Page Number:26016 -
DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/aa9eea
ISSN/ISBN:1752-7163 (Electronic) 1752-7155 (Linking)
Abstract:"Proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-ToF-MS) represents an attractive tool for the real-time analysis of VOC profiles in human breath. Quantification of breath VOCs by means of direct MS may be affected by the matrix, as human breath not only contains several hundred VOCs at the ppbV-pptV level, but is water saturated and contains percentage levels of CO(2). Investigation of breath biomarkers in clinical studies requires quantitative and comparable results. We therefore systematically assessed the effect of humidity, CO(2) and O(2) on the results of PTR-MS analysis. We investigated more than 20 VOCs, including aldehydes, ketones, aromatic compounds and hydrocarbons with different sample humidity, CO(2) and O(2) content. The influence of data processing (e.g. normalization to the H(3)O(+) ion count) was also addressed. An increase of the H(3)O(+) count of about 20% was observed when the humidity in the sample was increased to breath levels. Large differences regarding the measured VOC intensities were found between the dry and humid samples. Data normalization to the H(3)O(+) or water-clusters could not fully compensate for the humidity-dependent effects. However, as the determination of most VOCs linearly depends on the humidity over the whole investigated range, factor-based correction seems possible. The effects of CO(2) were more pronounced in the dry samples than in the humid samples but only had a minor influence on the results. The same was true for the influence of O(2). For the reliable quantification of VOCs in clinical studies and for the standardization of VOC research, well-adapted calibration standards are required for PTR-MS analysis"
Keywords:"Biomarkers/*analysis Breath Tests/*methods Calibration Carbon Dioxide/*analysis Exhalation Humans *Humidity Mass Spectrometry/*methods Oxygen/*analysis *Protons Reference Standards Respiration, Artificial Smoking/adverse effects Temperature Volatile Organ;"
Notes:"MedlineTrefz, Phillip Schubert, Jochen K Miekisch, Wolfram eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2017/12/05 J Breath Res. 2018 Mar 1; 12(2):026016. doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/aa9eea"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-11-2024