Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractHope for Ostomates: A Carbon and Zeolite Impregnated Polyester Fabric Inhibits Urine Odor in Cancer Patients: A Randomized Experimental Study    Next Abstract"IPEADAM study: indoor endotoxin exposure, family status, and some housing characteristics in English children" »

Int J Urol


Title:Accuracy of a new electronic nose for prostate cancer diagnosis in urine samples
Author(s):Taverna G; Grizzi F; Tidu L; Bax C; Zanoni M; Vota P; Lotesoriere BJ; Prudenza S; Magagnin L; Langfelder G; Buffi N; Casale P; Capelli L;
Address:"Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. Department of Urology, Humanitas Mater Domini Hospital, Varese, Italy. Department of Immunology and Inflammation, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy. Italian Ministry of Defenses, 'Vittorio Veneto' Division, Florence, Italy. Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering 'Giulio Natta', Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy"
Journal Title:Int J Urol
Year:2022
Volume:20220509
Issue:8
Page Number:890 - 896
DOI: 10.1111/iju.14912
ISSN/ISBN:1442-2042 (Electronic) 0919-8172 (Print) 0919-8172 (Linking)
Abstract:"OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of a new electronic nose to recognize prostate cancer in urine samples. METHODS: A blind, prospective study on consecutive patients was designed. Overall, 174 subjects were included in the study: 88 (50.6%) in prostate cancer group, and 86 (49.4%) in control group. Electronic nose performance for prostate cancer was assessed using sensitivity and specificity. The diagnostic accuracy of electronic nose was reported as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: The electronic nose in the study population reached a sensitivity 85.2% (95% confidence interval 76.1-91.9; 13 false negatives out of 88), a specificity 79.1% (95% confidence interval 69.0-87.1; 18 false positives out of 86). The accuracy of the electronic nose represented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.821 (95% confidence interval 0.764-0.879). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of electronic nose for recognizing prostate cancer in urine samples is high, promising and susceptible to supplemental improvement. Additionally, further studies will be necessary to design a clinical trial to validate electronic nose application in diagnostic prostate cancer nomograms"
Keywords:*Electronic Nose Humans Male Prospective Studies Prostate *Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis/urine ROC Curve cancer diagnosis eNose urine volatile organic compounds;
Notes:"MedlineTaverna, Gianluigi Grizzi, Fabio Tidu, Lorenzo Bax, Carmen Zanoni, Matteo Vota, Paolo Lotesoriere, Beatrice Julia Prudenza, Stefano Magagnin, Luca Langfelder, Giacomo Buffi, Nicolo Casale, Paolo Capelli, Laura eng Randomized Controlled Trial Australia 2022/05/10 Int J Urol. 2022 Aug; 29(8):890-896. doi: 10.1111/iju.14912. Epub 2022 May 9"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024