Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractMeasuring the quantity of harmful volatile organic compounds inhaled through masks    Next AbstractComparative Analysis of Phytochemical Composition of Gamma-Irradiated Mutant Cultivars of Chrysanthemum morifolium »

J Environ Biol


Title:Comparative studies on toluene removal and pressure drop in biofilters using different packing materials
Author(s):Ryu HW; Kim SJ; Cho KS;
Address:"Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul 156- 743, Korea"
Journal Title:J Environ Biol
Year:2010
Volume:31
Issue:3
Page Number:315 - 318
DOI:
ISSN/ISBN:0254-8704 (Print) 0254-8704 (Linking)
Abstract:"To select the best available packing material for malodorous organic gases such as toluene and benzene, biofilter performance was compared in biofilters employed different packing materials including porous ceramic (celite), Jeju scoria (lava), a mixture of granular activated carbon (GAC) and celite (GAC/celite), and cubic polyurethane foam (PU). A toluene-degrading bacterium, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia T3-c, was used as the inoculum. The maximum elimination capacities in the celite, lava, and GAC/celite biofilters were 100, 130, and 110 gm(-3) hr(-1), respectively. The elimination capacity for the PU biofilter was approximately 350 g m(-3) hr(-1) at an inlet loading of approximately 430 g m(-3) hr(-1), which was 2 to 3.5 times higher than for the other biofilters. The pressure drop gradually increased in the GAC/ celite, celite and lava biofilters after 23 day due to bacterial over-growth, and the toluene removal efficiency remarkably decreased with increasing pressure drop. Backwashing method was not effective for the control of biomass in these biofilters. In the PU biofilter however, backwashing allowed maintenance of a pressure drop of 1 to 3 mm H2O m(-1) and a removal efficiency of > 80%, indicating that the PU was the best packing material for toluene removal among the packing materials tested"
Keywords:"Air Pollution/*prevention & control Biodegradation, Environmental Ceramics Charcoal Diatomaceous Earth *Filtration Toluene/*metabolism Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis;"
Notes:"MedlineRyu, Hee Wook Kim, So Jung Cho, Kyung Suk eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't India 2010/11/05 J Environ Biol. 2010 May; 31(3):315-8"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024