Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractHistamine excretion in common indoor and hematophagous arthropods    Next AbstractCats vs. Dogs: The Efficacy of Feliway Friends(TM) and Adaptil(TM) Products in Multispecies Homes »

Molecules


Title:The Influence of Smoking Status on Exhaled Breath Profiles in Asthma and COPD Patients
Author(s):Principe S; van Bragt J; Longo C; de Vries R; Sterk PJ; Scichilone N; Vijverberg SJH; Maitland-van der Zee AH;
Address:"Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Dipartimento Universitario di Promozione della Salute, Materno Infantile, University of Palermo, Medicina Interna e Specialistica di Eccellenza 'G. D'Alessandro'(PROMISE) c/o Pneumologia, AOUP 'Policlinico Paolo Giaccone', 90127 Palermo, Italy. Breathomix b.v., 2333 Leiden, The Netherlands"
Journal Title:Molecules
Year:2021
Volume:20210304
Issue:5
Page Number: -
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26051357
ISSN/ISBN:1420-3049 (Electronic) 1420-3049 (Linking)
Abstract:"Breath analysis using eNose technology can be used to discriminate between asthma and COPD patients, but it remains unclear whether results are influenced by smoking status. We aim to study whether eNose can discriminate between ever- vs. never-smokers and smoking <24 vs. >24 h before the exhaled breath, and if smoking can be considered a confounder that influences eNose results. We performed a cross-sectional analysis in adults with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and healthy controls. Ever-smokers were defined as patients with current or past smoking habits. eNose measurements were performed by using the SpiroNose. The principal component (PC) described the eNose signals, and linear discriminant analysis determined if PCs classified ever-smokers vs. never-smokers and smoking <24 vs. >24 h. The area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) assessed the accuracy of the models. We selected 593 ever-smokers (167 smoked <24 h before measurement) and 303 never-smokers and measured the exhaled breath profiles of discriminated ever- and never-smokers (AUC: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.66-0.81), and no cigarette consumption <24h (AUC 0.54, 95% CI: 0.43-0.65). In healthy controls, the eNose did not discriminate between ever or never-smokers (AUC 0.54; 95% CI: 0.49-0.60) and recent cigarette consumption (AUC 0.60; 95% CI: 0.50-0.69). The eNose could distinguish between ever and never-smokers in asthma and COPD patients, but not recent smokers. Recent smoking is not a confounding factor of eNose breath profiles"
Keywords:"Adult Asthma/*diagnosis/etiology/metabolism Breath Tests/*methods Case-Control Studies Cross-Sectional Studies Electronic Nose/*statistics & numerical data *Exhalation Female Humans Male Middle Aged Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/*diagnosis/etiolo;"
Notes:"MedlinePrincipe, Stefania van Bragt, Job J M H Longo, Cristina de Vries, Rianne Sterk, Peter J Scichilone, Nicola Vijverberg, Susanne J H Maitland-van der Zee, Anke H eng Switzerland 2021/04/04 Molecules. 2021 Mar 4; 26(5):1357. doi: 10.3390/molecules26051357"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-11-2024