Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Highly alpha-selective hydrolysis of alpha,beta-epoxyalcohols using tetrabutylammonium fluoride"    Next AbstractField comparison of passive air samplers with reference monitors for ambient volatile organic compounds and nitrogen dioxide under week-long integrals »

J Air Waste Manag Assoc


Title:"Field method comparison between passive air samplers and continuous monitors for Vocs and NO2 in El Paso, Texas"
Author(s):Mukerjee S; Smith LA; Norris GA; Morandi MT; Gonzales M; Noble CA; Neas LM; Ozkaynak AH;
Address:"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA. mukerjee.shaibal@epa.gov"
Journal Title:J Air Waste Manag Assoc
Year:2004
Volume:54
Issue:3
Page Number:307 - 319
DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2004.10470903
ISSN/ISBN:1096-2247 (Print) 1096-2247 (Linking)
Abstract:"This study evaluates the performance of Model 3300 Ogawa Passive Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Samplers and 3M 3520 Organic Vapor Monitors (OVMs) by comparing integrated passive sampling concentrations to averaged hourly NO2 and volatile organic compound (VOC) measurements at two sites in El Paso, TX. Sampling periods were three time intervals (3-day weekend, 4-day weekday, and 7-day weekly) for three consecutive weeks. OVM concentrations were corrected for ambient pressure to account for higher elevation. Precise results (< 5% relative standard deviation, RSD) were found for NO2 measurements from collocated Ogawa samplers. Reproducibility was lower from duplicate OVMs for BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene isomers) VOCs (> or = 77% RSD for 2-day samples) with better precision for longer sampling periods. Comparison of Ogawa NO2 samplers with chemiluminescence measurements averaged over the same time period suggested potential calibration problems with the chemiluminescence analyzer. For BTEX species, generally good agreement was obtained between OVMs and automated-gas chromatograph (auto-GC) measurements. The OVMs successfully tracked increasing levels of VOCs recorded by the auto-GCs. However, except for toluene, OVM BTEX measurements generally exceeded their continuous counterparts with a mean bias of 5-10%. Although interpretation of the study results was limited due to small sample sizes, diffusion barrier influences caused by shelters that housed OVMs and differences in sampling heights between OVMs and auto-GC inlet may explain the overestimation"
Keywords:"Air Pollutants/*analysis Automation Environmental Monitoring/*methods Luminescent Measurements *Models, Statistical Nitrogen Dioxide/*analysis Organic Chemicals/analysis Sensitivity and Specificity Texas;"
Notes:"MedlineMukerjee, Shaibal Smith, Luther A Norris, Gary A Morandi, Maria T Gonzales, Melissa Noble, Christopher A Neas, Lucas M Ozkaynak, A Haluk eng Comparative Study Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 2004/04/08 J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2004 Mar; 54(3):307-19. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2004.10470903"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 24-11-2024