Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractFabrication of SnO(2) Composite Nanofiber-Based Gas Sensor using the Electrospinning Method for Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Detection    Next AbstractAccelerated time-of-flight (TOF) PET image reconstruction using TOF bin subsetization and TOF weighting matrix pre-computation »

J Chromatogr Sci


Title:Headspace analysis of some typical organic pollutants in drinking water using differential detectors: effects of columns and operational parameters
Author(s):Mehran MF; Golkar N; Cooper WJ; Vickers AK;
Address:"Drinking Water Research Center, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA"
Journal Title:J Chromatogr Sci
Year:1996
Volume:34
Issue:3
Page Number:122 - 129
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/34.3.122
ISSN/ISBN:0021-9665 (Print) 0021-9665 (Linking)
Abstract:"Environmental analytical procedures in the United States are largely based on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) methods. Different procedures have been adopted by the European Union (EU). In the United States, the determination of volatile organic compounds in drinking water employs purge and trap sampling followed by gas chromatography with photoionization and electrolytic conductivity detection. European analysts perform an 'equivalent' priority pollutant analysis using static headspace injections and electron-capture detection. Some of the compounds included on the EPA list (1) do not appear on the EU lists (2) and vice versa. A distinctive difference is the use of megabore (greater than 0.45-mm i.d.) capillary columns in the EPA methods. European analysts are reluctant to adopt these columns in their methodologies. In this work, several open-tubular column dimensions are investigated and optimized with particular attention given to problems encountered when columns are interfaced to purge and trap or static headspace analyzers. Also, EPA and EU priority pollutant methods are contrasted according to the method of detection"
Keywords:"Chromatography, Gas Electrochemistry Hydrocarbons/*analysis Hydrocarbons, Halogenated/analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical/*analysis Water Supply/*analysis;"
Notes:"MedlineMehran, M F Golkar, N Cooper, W J Vickers, A K eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 1996/03/01 J Chromatogr Sci. 1996 Mar; 34(3):122-9. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/34.3.122"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024