Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract[Detection of anaerobic processes and microorganisms in immobilized activated sludge of a wastewater treatment plant with intense aeration]    Next Abstract"Detection of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in surface water, soil, and groundwater in a chemical industrial park in Eastern China" »

Pest Manag Sci


Title:Comparison of field methyl isothiocyanate flux following Pacific Northwest surface-applied and ground-incorporated fumigation practices
Author(s):Littke MH; LePage J; Sullivan DA; Hebert VR;
Address:"Environmental Sciences Department, Washington State University Tri Cities, Richland, WA, USA"
Journal Title:Pest Manag Sci
Year:2013
Volume:20121016
Issue:5
Page Number:620 - 626
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3414
ISSN/ISBN:1526-4998 (Electronic) 1526-498X (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: A fumigant volatilization emission was conducted in Washington State in the fall of 2008 to estimate flux following applications of metam sodium by modified low-boom-height (LBH) center-pivot chemigation and soil-incorporated shank injection. This study was performed in a commercial potato field circle to assess emission rates and total cumulative field loss of methyl isothiocyanate (MITC) (the biologically active conversion product of metam sodium) under conditions typical for fall Pacific Northwest potato preplant fumigation. This assessment provides regionally specific MITC emission rate information for modeling appropriate field-edge set-back buffer distances for bystander protection. RESULTS: Soil-incorporated shank injection appreciably reduced MITC emissions, with lower periodic flux compared with low-drift surface-applied LBH chemigation during treatment applications and over the 4 day post-fumigation experimental timeframe. The estimated total cumulative fumigant loss was 13% by shank injection compared with 47% by LBH chemigation over the application/post-application monitoring period. CONCLUSION: The greater adoption of shank-injection fumigation will immediately aid in reducing bystander inhalation exposure to MITC, especially in high-soil-fumigation regions existing at the rural-urban interface"
Keywords:"Agriculture/*methods Air Pollution/*prevention & control Fumigation/*methods Isothiocyanates/*analysis Models, Theoretical Thiocarbamates/*administration & dosage;"
Notes:"MedlineLittke, Matt H LePage, Jane Sullivan, David A Hebert, Vincent R eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2012/10/18 Pest Manag Sci. 2013 May; 69(5):620-6. doi: 10.1002/ps.3414. Epub 2012 Oct 16"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024