Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractFirefighters' multiple exposure assessments in practice    Next Abstract"Fluoroalkylamines: Novel, Highly Volatile, Fast-Equilibrating, and Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry Signal-Enhancing Cationic Ion-Interaction Reagents" »

J Chromatogr A


Title:Determination of organic compounds from wood combustion aerosol nanoparticles by different gas chromatographic systems and by aerosol mass spectrometry
Author(s):Laitinen T; Martin SH; Parshintsev J; Hyotylainen T; Hartonen K; Riekkola ML; Kulmala M; Pavon JL;
Address:"University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, P.O. Box 55, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland"
Journal Title:J Chromatogr A
Year:2010
Volume:20091114
Issue:1
Page Number:151 - 159
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.11.028
ISSN/ISBN:1873-3778 (Electronic) 0021-9673 (Linking)
Abstract:"Organic compounds in atmospheric nanoparticles have an effect on human health and the climate. The determination of these particles is challenged by the difficulty of sampling, the complexity of sample composition, and the trace-level concentrations of the compounds. Meeting the challenge requires the development of sophisticated sampling systems for size-resolved particles and the optimization of sensitive, accurate and simple analytical techniques and methods. A new sampling system is proposed where particles are charged with a bipolar charger and size-segregated with a differential mobility analyzer. This system was successfully used to sample particles from wood pyrolysis with particle sizes 30-100nm. Particles were analyzed by four techniques: comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry, gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry, gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry, and aerosol mass spectrometry (aerosol MS). In the chromatographic techniques, particles were collected on a filter and analyzed off-line after sample preparation, whereas in the aerosol MS, particle analysis was performed directly from the particle source. Target compounds of the samples were polyaromatic hydrocarbons and n-alkanes. The analytical techniques were compared and their advantages and disadvantages were evaluated. The sampling system operated well and target compounds were identified in low concentrations"
Keywords:"Aerosols/chemistry Chromatography, Gas/*methods Mass Spectrometry/*methods Nanoparticles/*chemistry Organic Chemicals/*chemistry Volatilization Wood/*chemistry;"
Notes:"MedlineLaitinen, Totti Martin, Sara Herrero Parshintsev, Jevgeni Hyotylainen, Tuulia Hartonen, Kari Riekkola, Marja-Liisa Kulmala, Markku Pavon, Jose Luis Perez eng Evaluation Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Netherlands 2009/12/01 J Chromatogr A. 2010 Jan 1; 1217(1):151-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.11.028. Epub 2009 Nov 14"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024