Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractInheritance of olfactory preferences II. Olfactory receptor neuron responses from Heliothis subflexa x Heliothis virescens hybrid male moths    Next AbstractNearest neural neighbors: moth sex pheromone receptors HR11 and HR13 »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Balanced olfactory antagonism as a concept for understanding evolutionary shifts in moth sex pheromone blends
Author(s):Baker TC;
Address:"Center for Chemical Ecology, Department of Entomology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. tcb10@psu.edu"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2008
Volume:20080502
Issue:7
Page Number:971 - 981
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-008-9468-5
ISSN/ISBN:0098-0331 (Print) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"In the sex pheromone communication systems of moths, both heterospecific sex pheromone components and individual conspecific pheromone components may act as behavioral antagonists when they are emitted at excessive rates and ratios. In such cases, the resulting blend composition does not comprise the sex pheromone of a given species. That is, unless these compounds are emitted at optimal rates and ratios with other compounds, they act as behavioral antagonists. Thus, the array of blend compositions that are attractive to males is centered around the characterized female-produced sex pheromone blend of a species. I suggest here that the resulting optimal attraction of males to a sex pheromone is the result of olfactory antagonistic balance, compared to the would-be olfactory antagonistic imbalance imparted by behaviorally active compounds when they are emitted individually or in other off-ratio blends. Such balanced olfactory antagonism might be produced in any number of ways in olfactory pathways, one of which would be mutual, gamma-aminobutyric-acid-related disinhibition by local interneurons in neighboring glomeruli that receive excitatory inputs from pheromone-stimulated olfactory receptor neurons. Such mutual disinhibition would facilitate greater excitatory transmission to higher centers by projection interneurons arborizing in those glomeruli. I propose that in studies of moth sex pheromone olfaction, we should no longer artificially compartmentalize the olfactory effects of heterospecific behavioral antagonists into a special category distinct from olfaction involving conspecific sex pheromone components. Indeed, continuing to impose such a delineation among these compounds may retard advances in understanding how moth olfactory systems can evolve to allow males to exhibit correct behavioral responses (that is, attraction) to novel sex-pheromone-related compositions emitted by females"
Keywords:"Animals *Evolution, Molecular Female Male Moths/genetics/metabolism/*physiology Sex Attractants/*metabolism Sexual Behavior, Animal Smell/*physiology;"
Notes:"MedlineBaker, Thomas C eng 2008/05/03 J Chem Ecol. 2008 Jul; 34(7):971-81. doi: 10.1007/s10886-008-9468-5. Epub 2008 May 2"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024