Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractImpacts of Arctic diesel contamination on microbial community composition and degradative gene abundance during hydrocarbon biodegradation with and without nutrients: A case study of seven sub-Arctic soils    Next AbstractLoop replacement design: a new way to improve potency of plant cystatins »

BMC Ecol


Title:"Constitutive emission of the aphid alarm pheromone, (E)-beta-farnesene, from plants does not serve as a direct defense against aphids"
Author(s):Kunert G; Reinhold C; Gershenzon J;
Address:"Department of Biochemistry, Max-Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knoll Str, 8, 07745 Jena, Germany. gkunert@ice.mpg.de"
Journal Title:BMC Ecol
Year:2010
Volume:20101123
Issue:
Page Number:23 -
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-10-23
ISSN/ISBN:1472-6785 (Electronic) 1472-6785 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: The sesquiterpene, (E)-beta-farnesene (EBF), is the principal component of the alarm pheromone of many aphid species. Released when aphids are attacked by enemies, EBF leads aphids to undertake predator avoidance behaviors and to produce more winged offspring that can leave the plant. Many plants also release EBF as a volatile, and so it has been proposed that this compound could act to defend plants against aphid infestation by 1) deterring aphids from settling, 2) reducing aphid performance due to frequent interruption of feeding and 3) inducing the production of more winged offspring. Here we tested the costs and benefits of EBF as a defense against the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, using transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana lines engineered to continuously emit EBF. RESULTS: No metabolic costs of EBF synthesis could be detected in these plants as they showed no differences in growth or seed production from wild-type controls under two fertilizer regimes. Likewise, no evidence was found for the ability of EBF to directly defend the plant against aphids. EBF emission did not significantly repel winged or wingless morphs from settling on plants. Nor did EBF reduce aphid performance, measured as reproduction, or lead to an increase in the proportion of winged offspring. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of any defensive effect of EBF in this study might be due to the fact that natural enemy attack on individual aphids leads to a pulsed emission, but the transgenic lines tested continuously produce EBF to which aphids may become habituated. Thus our results provide no support for the hypothesis that plant emission of the aphid alarm pheromone EBF is a direct defense against aphids. However, there is scattered evidence elsewhere in the literature suggesting that EBF emission might serve as an indirect defense by attracting aphid predators"
Keywords:"Animals Aphids/*chemistry/physiology Arabidopsis/*chemistry *Food Chain Pheromones/chemistry Plants, Genetically Modified Sesquiterpenes/*chemistry;"
Notes:"MedlineKunert, Grit Reinhold, Carolina Gershenzon, Jonathan eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2010/11/26 BMC Ecol. 2010 Nov 23; 10:23. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-10-23"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024