Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractAnopheles gambiae s.l. swarms trapping as a complementary tool against residual malaria transmission in eastern Gambia    Next AbstractHigh Fructose Intake During Pregnancy in Rats Influences the Maternal Microbiome and Gut Development in the Offspring »

J Environ Manage


Title:Co-digestion of pig manure and glycerine: experimental and modelling study
Author(s):Astals S; Ariso M; Gali A; Mata-Alvarez J;
Address:"Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Barcelona, C/Marti i Franques, No. 1, 6th Floor, 08028 Barcelona, Spain"
Journal Title:J Environ Manage
Year:2011
Volume:20101222
Issue:4
Page Number:1091 - 1096
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.014
ISSN/ISBN:1095-8630 (Electronic) 0301-4797 (Linking)
Abstract:"It is a fact that the rapid increase of biodiesel production over the last years has resulted in the generation of large and constant amounts of glycerine, which is causing an oversupply problem. Since glycerine is a biodegradable organic compound exempt of nitrogen, it can be applied as a co-substrate in the anaerobic digestion process of pig manure (PM). In order to analyze the feasibility of a mixture of pig manure and glycerine in anaerobic processes and to define the effect originated by the nitrogen limitation when large amounts of glycerine are added, several biodegradability batch tests were performed with different mixtures. These were named as: 100% PM, 80% PM, 60% PM, 40% PM and 20% PM, in pig manure wet weight-basis. Furthermore, a modified model based on anaerobic digestion model no.1 (ADM1) was used to simulate the methane production profiles for the mixtures tested. Specifically, both experimental and model results show the power of the co-digestion technology. In particular, the mixture of 80% PM produced the highest methane production with 215 mL CH(4) g(-1) COD, almost 125% more methane than when pig manure was mono-digested. In contrast, the one with 20% PM was clearly inhibited by the volatile fatty acid due to the low nitrogen concentration of the mixture. In addition, the specific methane production predicted by the model was in good agreement with the experimental results, although in some samples the shape of the profiles did not match perfectly. Moreover, the modified ADM1 appears to be a useful tool to predict the methane production and the limitations related to the lack/excess of nitrogen during the co-digestion process of pig manure and glycerine"
Keywords:"Anaerobiosis Animals Biodegradation, Environmental Chromatography, Gas Glycerol/*metabolism *Manure Methane/*analysis Models, Biological Swine;"
Notes:"MedlineAstals, S Ariso, M Gali, A Mata-Alvarez, J eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2010/12/25 J Environ Manage. 2011 Apr; 92(4):1091-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.014. Epub 2010 Dec 22"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024