Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractA Nanoengineered Conductometric Device for Accurate Analysis of Elemental Mercury Vapor    Next AbstractMultimodal sensory integration of courtship stimulating cues in Drosophila melanogaster »

J Am Vet Med Assoc


Title:Effects of a synthetic facial pheromone on behavior of cats
Author(s):Griffith CA; Steigerwald ES; Buffington CA;
Address:"Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1089, USA"
Journal Title:J Am Vet Med Assoc
Year:2000
Volume:217
Issue:8
Page Number:1154 - 1156
DOI: 10.2460/javma.2000.217.1154
ISSN/ISBN:0003-1488 (Print) 0003-1488 (Linking)
Abstract:"OBJECTIVE: TO evaluate the effects of a synthetic feline facial pheromone (FFP) on behavior and food intake of healthy versus clinically ill cats. DESIGN: Original study. ANIMALS: 20 cats were used in each of 2 studies. In each study, 7 cats were considered healthy, and 13 cats were determined to be clinically ill. PROCEDURE: In study 1, cats were assigned either to exposure to FFP (treated group; 4 healthy, 6 ill cats) or to exposure to the vehicle (70% ethanol solution; control group; 3 healthy, 7 ill cats). Cats were placed in a cage containing a small cotton towel that had been sprayed with FFP or vehicle 30 minutes previously. Cats were then videotaped for 125 minutes, and food intake was measured during this period. Videotapes were scored at 5-minute intervals for various behaviors. In study 2, cats were categorized in 1 of 2 groups; group 1 (2 healthy, 8 ill cats) had a cat carrier placed in their cages, and group 2 (5 healthy, 5 ill cats) did not. All cats were exposed to FFP, and 24-hour food intake was measured. RESULTS: Differences between behaviors of healthy versus clinically ill cats were not identified. In the first study, significant increases in grooming and interest in food were found in cats exposed to FFP compared with vehicle. For all cats, significant positive correlations were detected between grooming and facial rubbing, walking and facial rubbing, interest in food and facial rubbing, eating and facial rubbing, grooming and interest in food, and grooming and eating. In the second study, 24-hour food intake was significantly greater in cats exposed to FFP and the cat carrier, compared with cats exposed to FFP alone. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggest that exposure to FFP may be useful to increase food intake of hospitalized cats"
Keywords:"Animals Behavior, Animal/*drug effects Cat Diseases/*physiopathology Cats/*physiology Double-Blind Method Eating/*drug effects Grooming/drug effects Motor Activity/drug effects Pheromones/*pharmacology Prospective Studies Videotape Recording;"
Notes:"MedlineGriffith, C A Steigerwald, E S Buffington, C A eng Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2000/10/24 J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000 Oct 15; 217(8):1154-6. doi: 10.2460/javma.2000.217.1154"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024