Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEffect of Drought and Salinity on Volatile Organic Compounds and Other Secondary Metabolites of Citrus aurantium Leaves    Next AbstractEmission Rates of Species-Specific Volatiles Vary across Communities of Clarkia Species: Evidence for Multimodal Character Displacement »

Am J Bot


Title:"Among- and within-population variation in morphology, rewards, and scent in a hawkmoth-pollinated plant"
Author(s):Eisen KE; Ma R; Raguso RA;
Address:"Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA"
Journal Title:Am J Bot
Year:2022
Volume:20220818
Issue:11
Page Number:1794 - 1810
DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.16030
ISSN/ISBN:1537-2197 (Electronic) 0002-9122 (Linking)
Abstract:"PREMISE: Floral scent is a complex trait that mediates many plant-insect interactions, but our understanding of how floral scent variation evolves, either independently or in concert with other traits, remains limited. Assessing variation in floral scent at multiple levels of biological organization and comparing patterns of variation in scent to variation in other floral traits can contribute to our understanding of how scent variation evolves in nature. METHODS: We used a greenhouse common garden experiment to investigate variation in floral scent at three scales-within plants, among plants, and among populations-and to determine whether scent, alone or in combination with morphology and rewards, contributes to population differentiation in Oenothera cespitosa subsp. marginata. Its range spans most of the biomes in the western United States, such that variation in both the abiotic and biotic environment could contribute to trait variation. RESULTS: Multiple analytical approaches demonstrated substantial variation among and within populations in compound-specific and total floral scent measures. Overall, populations were differentiated in morphology and reward traits and in scent. Across populations, coupled patterns of variation in linalool, leucine-derived compounds, and hypanthium length are consistent with a long-tongued moth pollination syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The considerable variation in floral scent detected within populations suggests that, similar to other floral traits, variation in floral scent may have a heritable genetic component. Differences in patterns of population differentiation in floral scent and in morphology and rewards indicate that these traits may be shaped by different selective pressures"
Keywords:Animals Odorants Flowers/anatomy & histology Pollination Pheromones Plants *Moths *Manduca Reward Onagraceae floral traits floral volatiles genetic variation intraspecific variation nectar plant-pollinator interactions;
Notes:"MedlineEisen, Katherine E Ma, Rong Raguso, Robert A eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 2022/06/29 Am J Bot. 2022 Nov; 109(11):1794-1810. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.16030. Epub 2022 Aug 18"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 17-11-2024