Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Weathering and Chemical Degradation of Methyl Eugenol and Raspberry Ketone Solid Dispensers for Detection, Monitoring, and Male Annihilation of Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii"    Next Abstract"Review. Sulfur-containing volatile compounds in seafood: occurrence, odorant properties and mechanisms of formation" »

J Econ Entomol


Title:Suppression of Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) With Trimedlure and Biolure Dispensers in Coffea arabica (Gentianales: Rubiaceae) in Hawaii
Author(s):Vargas RI; Souder SK; Rendon P; Mackey B;
Address:"USDA-ARS, Daniel K. Inouye U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Tropical Crop and Commodity Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Hilo, HI. IAEA-TCLAC, Guatemala City, Guatemala. USDA-ARS-PWA, Office of Area Director, Albany, CA"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2018
Volume:111
Issue:1
Page Number:293 - 297
DOI: 10.1093/jee/tox303
ISSN/ISBN:1938-291X (Electronic) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"To assess the potential to suppress Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann; Diptera: Tephritidae), via mass trapping with Trimedlure (TML), we compared fly catch (as catch per trap per time period) provided by either a novel, solid, triple-lure dispenser with TML, methyl eugenol (ME), and raspberry ketone (RK) (TMR) or solid TML plugs, both without insecticides, in addition to Biolure bait stations. Work was done in a coffee plantation that had a dense C. capitata population. Three treatments were compared: 1) TMR or TML (50 traps per ha), 2) Biolure (50 traps per ha), 3) TML (25 per ha) or TMR (25 per ha) + Biolure (25 per ha), and 4) an untreated control. During coffee season, based on C. capitata captures (mean flies per trap per wk) inside plastic McPhail traps, all treatments were significantly different than the control: Biolure (9.57) = TMR (11.28) = Biolure +TMR (13.50) < Control (36.06 flies/trap/wk). During non-coffee season, all treatments were significantly different than the control and TML was significantly lower than Biolure (wax matrix bait stations): TML (0.95) < Biolure (1.43) = Biolure +TML (1.77) < Control (2.81 flies/trap/wk). Surprisingly, captures were not lower in plots treated with combinations of Biolure + TMR or TML, compared to individual plots with Biolure or TML or TMR alone. Mass trapping with either TML or TMR dispensers deserves further study as a component of Integrated Pest Management programs for C. capitata in Hawaii and may have global potential for management of C. capitata"
Keywords:Animals *Butanones *Ceratitis capitata Coffea/*growth & development *Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids Eugenol/*analogs & derivatives Hawaii Insect Control/*methods Male Ceratitis capitata Integrated Pest Management fruit flies male annihilation male lures;
Notes:"MedlineVargas, Roger I Souder, Steven K Rendon, Pedro Mackey, Bruce eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2017/12/01 J Econ Entomol. 2018 Feb 9; 111(1):293-297. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox303"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 30-09-2024