Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractSexual pheromone detection using PANI.Ag nanohybrid and PANI/PSS nanocomposite nanosensors    Next Abstract"Transfer of a plasmid determining bacteriocin Bc-48 production and immunity, and response to sexual pheromones in Enterococcus faecalis S-48" »

Waste Manag


Title:The use of life cycle assessment for the comparison of biowaste composting at home and full scale
Author(s):Martinez-Blanco J; Colon J; Gabarrell X; Font X; Sanchez A; Artola A; Rieradevall J;
Address:"SosteniPrA Research Group, Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Edifici C Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain"
Journal Title:Waste Manag
Year:2010
Volume:20100307
Issue:6
Page Number:983 - 994
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.023
ISSN/ISBN:1879-2456 (Electronic) 0956-053X (Linking)
Abstract:"Environmental impacts and gaseous emissions associated to home and industrial composting of the source-separated organic fraction of municipal solid waste have been evaluated using the environmental tool of life cycle assessment (LCA). Experimental data of both scenarios were experimentally collected. The functional unit used was one ton of organic waste. Ammonia, methane and nitrous oxide released from home composting (HC) were more than five times higher than those of industrial composting (IC) but the latter involved within 2 and 53 times more consumption or generation of transport, energy, water, infrastructures, waste and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) emissions than HC. Therefore, results indicated that IC was more impacting than HC for four of the impact categories considered (abiotic depletion, ozone layer depletion, photochemical oxidation and cumulative energy demand) and less impacting for the other three (acidification, eutrophication and global warming). Production of composting bin and gaseous emissions are the main responsible for the HC impacts, whereas for IC the main contributions come from collection and transportation of organic waste, electricity consumption, dumped waste and VOCs emission. These results suggest that HC may be an interesting alternative or complement to IC in low density areas of population"
Keywords:Environmental Monitoring Gases/analysis Global Warming/*prevention & control Industry Organic Chemicals/metabolism Refuse Disposal/*methods Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis;
Notes:"MedlineMartinez-Blanco, Julia Colon, Joan Gabarrell, Xavier Font, Xavier Sanchez, Antoni Artola, Adriana Rieradevall, Joan eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2010/03/10 Waste Manag. 2010 Jun; 30(6):983-94. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.023. Epub 2010 Mar 7"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-06-2024