Title: | Sources and migration of volatile organic compounds in mixed-use buildings |
Author(s): | Jia C; Batterman S; Godwin C; Charles S; Chin JY; |
Address: | "School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA" |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00643.x |
ISSN/ISBN: | 1600-0668 (Electronic) 0905-6947 (Linking) |
Abstract: | "We examined concentrations and migration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in ten mixed-use buildings in southeast Michigan, USA. In an office and work zone in each building, air exchange rates (AERs) were measured using perfluorocarbon tracers, and over 96 VOC species were measured by GC/MS over a 7-day period. VOCs were then apportioned to sources in offices, work zones, and outdoors using a two-zone mass balance model. AERs averaged 3.9 h (0.2-14.2 h) in offices and 1.9 h (0.4-3.5 h) in work zones. The dominant VOCs included aromatics, terpenes and alkanes. VOC concentrations were uniform in the smaller spaces, and more variable in some of the very large spaces. Apportionments depended on the VOC and building, but emissions in industrial zones of buildings often migrated to office areas where they frequently accounted for the bulk of VOC concentrations. Outdoor sources accounted for most benzene and carbon tetrachloride, and a small fraction of aromatic and aliphatic compounds. This study shows that pollutant migration can be a significant and not uncommon problem in mixed-use buildings, and it demonstrates the need for better control of emissions and pollutant migration. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Pollutant exposures in industrial, commercial, and institutional buildings arise from indoor and outdoor sources that can be identified, apportioned, and controlled with knowledge of emission sources and building airflows. We show that multi-tracer techniques are an effective and practical means of determining airflows and exchange rates in large buildings. In examining a set of mixed-use buildings, a substantial fraction of VOC exposures in otherwise relatively 'clean' offices is due to pollutant migration from 'dirty' zones of the building. This indicates the need for corrective actions to minimize exposures of office workers that are unwanted and probably unknown to building managers. These actions should include better control of emissions, isolation or control of air and pollutant flows between building zones, and documentation of the effectiveness of such measures when strong emission sources are present" |
Keywords: | "*Air Movements Air Pollutants, Occupational/*analysis Air Pollution, Indoor/*analysis Chromatography, Gas Environmental Monitoring/methods Michigan Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis;" |
Notes: | "MedlineJia, C Batterman, S Godwin, C Charles, S Chin, J-Y eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2010/06/29 Indoor Air. 2010 Oct; 20(5):357-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00643.x" |