Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractInvasion in patchy landscapes is affected by dispersal mortality and mate-finding failure    Next AbstractEvaluation of remote delivery of Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) technology to mark large mammals »

Pest Manag Sci


Title:Evaluating the success of treatments that slow spread of an invasive insect pest
Author(s):Walter JA; Rodenberg CA; Stovall AEL; Nunez-Mir GC; Onufrieva KS; Johnson DM;
Address:"Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship, Montclair, NJ, USA. Geographical Sciences Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA. Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA"
Journal Title:Pest Manag Sci
Year:2021
Volume:20210619
Issue:10
Page Number:4607 - 4613
DOI: 10.1002/ps.6500
ISSN/ISBN:1526-4998 (Electronic) 1526-498X (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Treatments for the suppression and eradication of insect populations undergo substantial testing to ascertain their efficacy and safety, but the generally limited spatial and temporal scope of such studies limit knowledge of how contextual factors encountered in operational contexts shape the relative success of pest management treatments. These contextual factors potentially include ecological characteristics of the treated area, or the timing of treatments relative to pest phenology and weather events. We used an extensive database on over 1000 treatments of nascent populations of Lymantria dispar (L.) (gypsy moth) to examine how place-based and time-varying conditions shape the success of management treatments. RESULTS: We found treatment success to vary across states and years, and to be highest in small treatment blocks that are isolated from other populations. In addition, treatment success tended to be lower in treatment blocks with open forest canopies, possibly owing to challenges of effectively distributing treatments in these areas. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasize the importance of monitoring for early detection of nascent gypsy moth colonies in order to successfully slow the spread of the invasion. Additionally, operations research should address best practices for effectively treating with patchy and open forest canopies. (c) 2021 Society of Chemical Industry"
Keywords:Animals Forests *Moths Bacillus thuringiensis gypsy moth mating disruption pest management;
Notes:"MedlineWalter, Jonathan A Rodenberg, Clare A Stovall, Atticus E L Nunez-Mir, Gabriela C Onufrieva, Ksenia S Johnson, Derek M eng England 2021/06/05 Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Oct; 77(10):4607-4613. doi: 10.1002/ps.6500. Epub 2021 Jun 19"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-12-2024