Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractCharacterising sources and sinks of rural VOC in eastern France    Next AbstractA non-invasive tool for early detection of acute leukemia in children using a paper-based optoelectronic nose based on an array of metallic nanoparticles »

J Econ Entomol


Title:Comparison of pheromone-mediated mating disruption and conventional insecticides for management of tufted apple bud moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Author(s):Borchert DM; Walgenbach JF;
Address:"Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Mountain Horticultural Crops Research & Extension Center, Fletcher 28732, USA"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2000
Volume:93
Issue:3
Page Number:769 - 776
DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-93.3.769
ISSN/ISBN:0022-0493 (Print) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"Large-plot studies were used to compare pheromone-mediated mating disruption and conventional insecticide applications for management of tufted apple bud moth, Platynota idaeusalis (Walker), in North Carolina in 1993 and 1994. Pheromone trap catches were reduced in mating disruption blocks, and traps placed in the lower stratum of the canopy had a higher level of trap capture reduction compared with traps placed in the upper stratum. First-generation tufted apple bud moth exposure to either pheromones for mating disruption or insecticides affected second generation pheromone trap catches in the lower and upper canopy. More second generation male moths were caught in pheromone traps placed in the upper compared with the lower canopy in blocks treated with pheromones for mating disruption during the first generation, whereas the opposite was true in blocks treated with insecticides during the first generation. Despite reduced trap catches in pheromone-treated blocks, egg mass densities were not reduced in these blocks compared with insecticide-treated blocks. Furthermore, fruit damage was not significantly different between mating disruption blocks and conventionally treated blocks in orchards with relatively low populations of tufted apple bud moth, but damage was greater in mating disruption blocks in orchards with higher moth densities"
Keywords:"Animals Chlorpyrifos Dimethoate *Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated Female Insect Control/*methods *Insecticides Male Methyl Parathion *Moths Pest Control, Biological Phosmet *Poaceae *Sex Attractants *Sexual Behavior, Animal;"
Notes:"MedlineBorchert, D M Walgenbach, J F eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. England 2000/07/21 J Econ Entomol. 2000 Jun; 93(3):769-76. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-93.3.769"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024