Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDesigning SnO(2) Nanostructure-Based Sensors with Tailored Selectivity toward Propanol and Ethanol Vapors    Next AbstractDetermination of volatile organic compounds in river water by solid phase extraction and gas chromatography »

Food Chem


Title:Comparison of the physicochemical and volatile composition of wine fractions obtained by two different dealcoholization techniques
Author(s):Motta S; Guaita M; Petrozziello M; Ciambotti A; Panero L; Solomita M; Bosso A;
Address:"Consiglio per la Ricerca Agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria - Centro di Ricerca per l'Enologia, via P. Micca 35, 14100 Asti, Italy. Consiglio per la Ricerca Agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria - Centro di Ricerca per l'Enologia, via P. Micca 35, 14100 Asti, Italy. Electronic address: antonella.bosso@crea.gov.it"
Journal Title:Food Chem
Year:2017
Volume:20161012
Issue:
Page Number:1 - 10
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.046
ISSN/ISBN:1873-7072 (Electronic) 0308-8146 (Linking)
Abstract:"Three wines (a Rose wine, a Pelaverga and a Barbera red wines) were dealcoholized at 5% v/v ethanol with two different techniques: membrane contactor (MC) and distillation under vacuum (D). The influence of the treatments on the physicochemical composition and aromatic profile of the dealcoholized fractions was investigated. The main difference between the two techniques was the concentration grade reached by the dealcoholized fractions, which was 5-6times higher with D than with MC due to the concomitant loss of water. The main fixed compounds (organic acids, cations, polyphenols, anthocyanins) were not lost during the dealcoholization, while the losses of volatile compounds were relevant. Finally, the delta(18)O isotopic ratio was studied. The delta(18)O isotope ratio increased with D and decreased with MC. At the same time the delta(18)O isotope ratio fell within legal limits when the final ethanol content was adjusted to 2% by blending with dealcoholized fractions"
Keywords:Anthocyanins/analysis/chemistry/isolation & purification Chemical Fractionation/*methods Polyphenols/analysis/chemistry/isolation & purification Vitis/chemistry Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis/chemistry/*isolation & purification Wine/*analysis Aroma D;
Notes:"MedlineMotta, Silvia Guaita, Massimo Petrozziello, Maurizio Ciambotti, Aldo Panero, Loretta Solomita, Mauro Bosso, Antonella eng Comparative Study England 2016/12/17 Food Chem. 2017 Apr 15; 221:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.046. Epub 2016 Oct 12"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-11-2024