Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEffects of different male remating intervals on the reproductive success of Choristoneura rosaceana males and females    Next AbstractDegradation of a-factor by a Saccharomyces cerevisiae alpha-mating-type-specific endopeptidase: evidence for a role in recovery of cells from G1 arrest »

J Agric Food Chem


Title:Characterization of the Key Aroma Compounds in a Commercial Fino and a Commercial Pedro Ximenez Sherry Wine by Application of the Sensomics Approach
Author(s):Marcq P; Schieberle P;
Address:"Leibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology at TU Munich (formerly Deutsche Forschungsanstalt fur Lebensmittelchemie), Lise-Meitner-Strasse 34, D-85354 Freising, Germany. Faculty of Chemistry, Technische Universitat Munchen, Lichtenbergstrasse 4, 85748 Garching, Germany"
Journal Title:J Agric Food Chem
Year:2021
Volume:20210421
Issue:17
Page Number:5125 - 5133
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01348
ISSN/ISBN:1520-5118 (Electronic) 0021-8561 (Linking)
Abstract:"Following the sensomics approach, the key aroma compounds of a commercial Fino and Pedro Ximenez sherry were identified, quantitated, and validated through recombination experiments. In Fino sherry, 31 compounds were determined in concentrations above their odor detection thresholds, with the fruity/green smelling 1,1-diethoxyethane displaying the highest odor activity value ((OAV); the ratio of the concentration to the odor threshold) of 8970, followed by ethyl (2S,3S)-hydroxy-3-methylpentanoate (853) and 2- and 3-methylbutanal (448). In the Pedro Ximenez sherry, 23 compounds were present in concentrations exceeding their odor thresholds, and the malty smelling 2- and 3-methylbutanal were found with the highest OAV (1006), followed by 1,1-diethoxyethane (808) and methylpropanal (561). The results were compared to those characterized previously by us in an Amontillado sherry revealing that in all three sherry wines, 1,1-diethoxyethane, 2- and 3-methylbutanal, methylpropanal, ethanol, ethyl (2S,3S)-2-hydroxy-3-methylpentanoate, acetaldehyde, and 3-(methylthio)propanal, as well as the fruity-smelling ethyl 2-methylbutanoate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate, and ethyl 3-methylbutanoate ranked among the 15 odorants with the highest OAVs. But, although most odorants were identical in the three sherries, their amounts differed significantly. The results are discussed considering the different winemaking processes and the different aroma profiles"
Keywords:Ethanol Fruit Odorants/analysis Smell *Volatile Organic Compounds *Wine/analysis 6-ethoxy-tetrahydropyran-2-one Aeda Gc/o aroma recombinate odor activity value static headspace olfactometry;
Notes:"MedlineMarcq, Pauline Schieberle, Peter eng 2021/04/22 J Agric Food Chem. 2021 May 5; 69(17):5125-5133. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01348. Epub 2021 Apr 21"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-11-2024