| Title: | Volatile organic compound and particulate emissions from the production and use of thermoplastic biocomposite 3D printing filaments |
| Author(s): | Vaisanen A; Alonen L; Ylonen S; Hyttinen M; |
| Address: | "Faculty of Science and Forestry, Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. School of Engineering and Technology, Savonia University of Applied Sciences, Kuopio, Finland" |
| DOI: | 10.1080/15459624.2022.2063879 |
| ISSN/ISBN: | 1545-9632 (Electronic) 1545-9624 (Linking) |
| Abstract: | "Biocomposites (BCs) can be used as substitutes for unsustainable polymers in 3D printing, but their safety demands additional investigation as biological fillers may produce altered emissions during thermal processing. Commercial filament extruders can be used to produce custom feedstocks, but they are another source of airborne contaminants and demand further research. These knowledge gaps are targeted in this study. Volatile organic compound (VOC), carbonyl compound, ultrafine particle (UFP), and fine (PM(2.5)) and coarse (PM(10)) particle air concentrations were measured in this study as a filament extruder and a 3D printer were operated under an office environment using one PLA and four PLA-based BC feedstocks. Estimates of emission rates (ERs) for total VOCs (TVOC) and UFPs were also calculated. VOCs were analyzed with a GC-MS system, carbonyls were analyzed with an LC-MS/MS system, whereas real-time particle concentrations were monitored with continuously operating instruments. VOC concentrations were low throughout the experiment; TVOC ranged between 34-63 microg/m(3) during filament extrusion and 41-56 microg/m(3) during 3D printing, which represent calculated TVOC ERs of 2.6?ªª3.6 x 10(2) and 2.9?ªª3.6 x 10(2) microg/min. Corresponding cumulative carbonyls ranged between 60-91 and 190-253 microg/m(3). Lactide and miscellaneous acids and alcohols were the dominant VOCs, while acetone, 2-butanone, and formaldehyde were the dominant carbonyls. Terpenes contributed for ca. 20-40% of TVOC during BC processing. The average UFP levels produced by the filament extruder were 0.85 x 10(2)-1.05 x 10(3) #/cm(3), while the 3D printer generated 6.05 x 10(2)-2.09 x 10(3) #/cm(3) particle levels. Corresponding particle ERs were 5.3 x 10(8)-6.6 x 10(9) and 3.8 x 10(9)-1.3 x 10(10) #/min. PM(2.5) and PM(10) particles were produced in the following average quantities; PM(2.5) levels ranged between 0.2-2.2 microg/m(3), while PM(10) levels were between 5-20 microg/m(3) for all materials. The main difference between the pure PLA and BC feedstock emissions was terpenes, present during all BC extrusion processes. BCs are similar emission sources as pure plastics based on our findings, and a filament extruder produces contaminants at comparable or slightly lower levels in comparison to 3D printers" |
| Keywords: | "*Air Pollutants/analysis *Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis Chromatography, Liquid Dust Particle Size Particulate Matter/analysis Polyesters Printing, Three-Dimensional Tandem Mass Spectrometry Terpenes *Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis 3D printing emissi;" |
| Notes: | "MedlineVaisanen, Antti Alonen, Lauri Ylonen, Sampsa Hyttinen, Marko eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2022/04/12 J Occup Environ Hyg. 2022 Jun; 19(6):381-393. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2022.2063879. Epub 2022 May 11" |
