Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractControl of grape berry moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in relation to oviposition phenology    Next AbstractThe incongruent gelatinase genotype and phenotype in Enterococcus faecalis are due to shutting off the ability to respond to the gelatinase biosynthesis-activating pheromone (GBAP) quorum-sensing signal »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Effect of pheromone dispenser density on timing and duration of approaches by peachtree borer
Author(s):Teixeira LA; Grieshop MJ; Gut LJ;
Address:"Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. teixei10@msu.edu"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2010
Volume:20100903
Issue:10
Page Number:1148 - 1154
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-010-9853-8
ISSN/ISBN:1573-1561 (Electronic) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"The timing and duration of approaches by male peachtree borer Synanthedon exitiosa Say (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) to commercial pheromone dispensers placed singly or at high density in peach orchards was determined by using field-deployed video cameras and digital video recorders. Cameras were trained on one dispenser, and one standard lure was placed in a peach orchard, and on 12 dispensers in a separate orchard where dispensers for mating disruption had been placed at 371 per hectare. Male moth approaches were video recorded at the peak of peachtree borer annual flight, from 13 to 18 August 2009. The mean approach timing (h:min:sec+/-SD) during the study period was 11:33:12 +/- 00:46:43, 11:43:52 +/- 00:45:58, and 11:41:21 +/- 00:45:54 AM with the single dispenser, high-density dispensers, and lure, respectively. Day-to-day variability in approach timings suggested that there were no biologically significant differences among treatments. The frequency distribution of approach durations varied among treatments, as the high-density dispensers had mostly short approaches, while the distribution of approaches to the single dispenser and lure was wider. The median (interquartile range) approach duration was 3 (2-4), 1 (1-2), and 4 (2-6) seconds with the single dispenser, high-density dispensers, and lure, respectively. The relative rank of median approach durations was constant throughout the period, indicating differences among treatments. This study showed that the presence of pheromone dispensers for mating disruption did not cause an advancement of peachtree borer diel rhythm of response. Shorter approaches to dispensers placed at high density than singly suggest that dispenser retentiveness is not constant with peachtree borer, which may bias estimates of disruption activity as a function of dispenser density"
Keywords:"Animals Lepidoptera/*drug effects/physiology Male Pheromones/*pharmacology Sex Attractants/*pharmacology Sexual Behavior, Animal/*drug effects/physiology Time Factors Video Recording/*methods;"
Notes:"MedlineTeixeira, Luis A F Grieshop, Matthew J Gut, Larry J eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2010/09/04 J Chem Ecol. 2010 Oct; 36(10):1148-54. doi: 10.1007/s10886-010-9853-8. Epub 2010 Sep 3"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024