Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractIndoor Dust/Air Partitioning: Evidence for Kinetic Delay in Equilibration for Low-Volatility SVOCs    Next AbstractComparison of Sangiovese wines obtained from stabilized organic and biodynamic vineyard management systems »

Food Chem


Title:Chemical and sensory characterisation of Sangiovese red wines: comparison between biodynamic and organic management
Author(s):Parpinello GP; Rombola AD; Simoni M; Versari A;
Address:"Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Piazza Goidanich 60, Cesena, FC 47521, Italy. Electronic address: giusi.parpinello@unibo.it. Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale G. Fanin 44, Bologna, BO 40127, Italy. Astra - Innovazione e Sviluppo, Via Tebano 45, Faenza, RA 48018, Italy. Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Piazza Goidanich 60, Cesena, FC 47521, Italy"
Journal Title:Food Chem
Year:2015
Volume:20140702
Issue:
Page Number:145 - 152
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.093
ISSN/ISBN:1873-7072 (Electronic) 0308-8146 (Linking)
Abstract:"The effects of biodynamic production practices on composition and sensory attributes of Sangiovese wines were examined for 2 years (2009 and 2010) in a vineyard that was converted from organic (ORG) to biodynamic (BDN) viticulture. During the first year (2009), the BDN wines were characterised by low alcohol strength, colour intensity, total polyphenols, monomeric anthocyanins and catechin. Conversely, the second year BDN wines differed from the organic wines in terms of total polyphenols and phenolic compounds, including polymeric pigments, co-pigmentation, tannins and iron-reactive polyphenols. The effect of management practices, harvest and their interaction was analysed for each compound. Positive interaction was observed for total acidity, volatile acidity, cyanidin-3-glucoside, protocatechuic acid, (+)-catechin, quercetin and trans-resveratrol. ORG wine initially showed a more complex aroma profile; however, the differences were almost indistinguishable during the second year. Trained panellists highlighted differences in colour intensity between ORG and BDN wines although no preference was found by consumers. The concentrations of ochratoxin A and biogenic amines were far below the health-hazardous threshold"
Keywords:Biogenic Amines Catechin/analysis Humans Phenols/analysis Polyphenols/*analysis Resveratrol Stilbenes/*analysis Volatile Organic Compounds Wine/*analysis Biodynamic preparations Ochratoxin A Organic wine Phenolic compounds Sensory evaluation Volatile comp;
Notes:"MedlineParpinello, Giuseppina Paola Rombola, Adamo Domenico Simoni, Marco Versari, Andrea eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2014/08/26 Food Chem. 2015 Jan 15; 167:145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.093. Epub 2014 Jul 2"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 04-12-2024