Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractFunctional Characterization of Odorant Binding Protein 27 (RproOBP27) From Rhodnius prolixus Antennae    Next AbstractControl of Rhizopus stolonifer in strawberries by the combination of essential oil with carboxymethylcellulose »

Foods


Title:"Compositional Signatures of Conventional, Free Range, and Organic Pork Meat Using Fingerprint Techniques"
Author(s):Oliveira GB; Alewijn M; Boerrigter-Eenling R; van Ruth SM;
Address:"RIKILT, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 230, Wageningen 6700 AE, The Netherlands. gbremer@hotmail.com. RIKILT, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 230, Wageningen 6700 AE, The Netherlands. martin.alewijn@wur.nl. RIKILT, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 230, Wageningen 6700 AE, The Netherlands. RIKILT, Wageningen University and Research Centre, P.O. Box 230, Wageningen 6700 AE, The Netherlands. saskia.vanruth@wur.nl. Food Quality and Design Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 17, Wageningen 6700 AA, The Netherlands. saskia.vanruth@wur.nl"
Journal Title:Foods
Year:2015
Volume:20150825
Issue:3
Page Number:359 - 375
DOI: 10.3390/foods4030359
ISSN/ISBN:2304-8158 (Print) 2304-8158 (Electronic) 2304-8158 (Linking)
Abstract:"Consumers' interest in the way meat is produced is increasing in Europe. The resulting free range and organic meat products retail at a higher price, but are difficult to differentiate from their counterparts. To ascertain authenticity and prevent fraud, relevant markers need to be identified and new analytical methodology developed. The objective of this pilot study was to characterize pork belly meats of different animal welfare classes by their fatty acid (Fatty Acid Methyl Ester-FAME), non-volatile compound (electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry-ESI-MS/MS), and volatile compound (proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry-PTR-MS) fingerprints. Well-defined pork belly meat samples (13 conventional, 15 free range, and 13 organic) originating from the Netherlands were subjected to analysis. Fingerprints appeared to be specific for the three categories, and resulted in 100%, 95.3%, and 95.3% correct identity predictions of training set samples for FAME, ESI-MS/MS, and PTR-MS respectively and slightly lower scores for the validation set. Organic meat was also well discriminated from the other two categories with 100% success rates for the training set for all three analytical approaches. Ten out of 25 FAs showed significant differences in abundance between organic meat and the other categories, free range meat differed significantly for 6 out of the 25 FAs. Overall, FAME fingerprinting presented highest discrimination power"
Keywords:Esi-ms/ms Ptr-ms authenticity fatty acid analysis fraud profiling;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEOliveira, Gislene B Alewijn, Martin Boerrigter-Eenling, Rita van Ruth, Saskia M eng Switzerland 2015/08/25 Foods. 2015 Aug 25; 4(3):359-375. doi: 10.3390/foods4030359"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 04-12-2024